Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849537›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2022

Are we allowed to visit now? Concerns and issues surrounding vaccination and infection risks in UK care homes during COVID-19.

Clarissa Giebel, Kerry Hanna, Jacqueline Cannon, Paul Marlow, Hilary Tetlow, Stephen Mason, Justine Shenton, Manoj Rajagopal, Mark Gabbay

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Developing a Meaningful Garden Space in a Care Home with Staff and Family Members: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-0566
Kerry HannaDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7357-7749
Jacqueline CannonLewy Body Society, Wigan, UK.
Paul MarlowNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Hilary TetlowNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen MasonPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Justine ShentonSefton Advocacy, Liverpool, UK.
Manoj RajagopalLancashire and South Cumbria NHS Trust, Preston, UK.
Mark GabbayDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBLancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Lewy Body Society · GB

Funding

NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundvaccination uptake in the UK and increased care home testing are likely affecting care home visitation. With scant scientific evidence to date, the aim of this longitudinal qualitative study was to explore the impact of both (vaccination and testing) on the conduct and experiences of care home visits.

methodsfamily carers of care home residents with dementia and care home staff from across the UK took part in baseline (October/November 2020) and follow-up interviews (March 2021). Public advisers were involved in all elements of the research. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsacross 62 baseline and follow-up interviews with family carers (n = 26; 11) and care home staff (n = 16; 9), five core themes were developed: delayed and inconsistent offers of face-to-face visits; procedures and facilitation of visits; variable uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine; misinformation, education and free choice; frustration and anger among family carers. The variable uptake in staff, compared to family carers, was a key factor seemingly influencing visitation, with a lack of clear guidance leading care homes to implement infection control measures and visitation rights differently.

conclusionswe make five recommendations in this paper to enable improved care home visitation in the ongoing, and in future, pandemics. Visits need to be enabled and any changes to visiting rights must be used as a last resort, reviewed regularly in consultation with residents and carers and restored as soon as possible as a top priority, whilst more education needs to be provided surrounding vaccination for care home staff.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2United KingdomVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinescare homesCOVID-19dementiaolder peoplequalitativesocial carestaffvaccination

Identifiers

PMID34849537
PMCPMC8689977
OpenAlexW3216489659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.