Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849524›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2022

Full breastfeeding protection against common enteric bacteria and viruses: results from the MAL-ED cohort study.

Benjamin J J McCormick, Stephanie A Richard, Laura E Murray-Kolb, Gagandeep Kang, Aldo A M Lima, Estomih Mduma, Margaret N Kosek, Elizabeth T Rogawski McQuade, Eric R Houpt, Pascal Bessong and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence of DiarrhoeagenicMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Benjamin J J McCormickFogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8060-0502
Stephanie A RichardFogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Laura E Murray-KolbThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Gagandeep KangChristian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3656-564X
Aldo A M LimaFederal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Estomih MdumaHaydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Manyara, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-3982
Margaret N KosekUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Elizabeth T Rogawski McQuadeUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Eric R HouptUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Pascal BessongUniversity of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.
Sanjaya ShresthaWalter Reed/AFRIMS Research Unit, Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Zulfiqar BhuttaAga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-0637-599X
Tahmeed Ahmedicddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-7439
Laura E CaulfieldThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-1004
MAL-ED Network Investigators
University of Virginia · USNational Institutes of Health · USAga Khan University · PKChristian Medical College, Vellore · INHaydom Lutheran Hospital · TZInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDJohns Hopkins University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversity of Venda · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreastfeeding is known to reduce the risk of enteropathogen infections, but protection from specific enteropathogens is not well characterized.

objectiveThe aim was to estimate the association between full breastfeeding (days fed breast milk exclusively or with nonnutritive liquids) and enteropathogen detection.

methodsA total of 2145 newborns were enrolled at 8 sites, of whom 1712 had breastfeeding and key enteropathogen data through 6 mo. We focused on 11 enteropathogens: adenovirus 40/41, norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, and rotavirus, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), Campylobacter spp., and typical enteropathogenic E. coli as well as entero-aggregative E. coli, Shigella and Cryptosporidium. Logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of enteropathogen detection in stools and survival analysis was used to estimate the timing of first detection of an enteropathogen.

resultsInfants with 10% more days of full breastfeeding within the preceding 30 d of a stool sample were less likely to have the 3 E. coli and Campylobacter spp. detected in their stool (mean odds: 0.92-0.99) but equally likely (0.99-1.02) to have the viral pathogens detected in their stool. A 10% longer period of full breastfeeding from birth was associated with later first detection of the 3 E. coli, Campylobacter, adenovirus, astrovirus, and rotavirus (mean HRs of 0.52-0.75). The hazards declined and point estimates were not statistically significant at 3 mo.

conclusionsIn this large multicenter cohort study, full breastfeeding was associated with lower likelihood of detecting 4 important enteric pathogens in the first 6 mo of life. These results also show that full breastfeeding is related to delays in the first detection of some bacterial and viral pathogens in the stool. As several of these pathogens are risk factors for poor growth during childhood, this work underscores the importance of exclusive or full breastfeeding during the first 6 mo of life to optimize early health.

Indexed as

CryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumGastrointestinal MicrobiomeVirusesBreast FeedingCohort StudiesDiarrheaEscherichia coliFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Newbornbreastfeedingenteropathogensenteropathyinfant feedingMAL-ED

Identifiers

PMID34849524
PMCPMC8895209
OpenAlexW3216510941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.