ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2021
Recombinant porcine factor VIII: Lessons from the past and place in the management of hemophilia A with inhibitors in 2021.
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Clinical efficacy and safety of Octocog alfa in Chinese patients with hemophilia A: One-year follow-up results from the Antihemophilic Factor Hemophilia A Outcome Database (AHEAD) study].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
- Cross-reacting antiporcine factor VIII inhibitors in patients with acquired hemophilia A.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- From a bispecific monoclonal antibody to gene therapy: A new era in the treatment of hemophilia A.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2023Review
- Recombinant porcine factor VIII: Lessons from the past and place in the management of hemophilia A with inhibitors in 2021.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most serious complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy is the occurrence of anti-FVIII alloantibodies that can strongly reduce or abolish the effect of human FVIII products. Bypassing agents to control bleeding episodes are recommended for these patients, but their efficacy is difficult to predict and monitor. FVIII products derived from porcine plasma had an important role in the treatment of hemophilia A for 50 years, from 1954 to 2004. Indeed, porcine FVIII could achieve hemostasis in patients in whom human FVIII products were ineffective. A recombinant porcine FVIII product is now available. This highly purified protein has the same biochemical and hemostatic properties, but much lower risks of infection and toxicity compared with plasma-derived porcine FVIII. The product is licensed in the United States and Europe for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A. However, this recombinant molecule could also be of clinical interest for people with inherited hemophilia A and inhibitors, particularly for the management of bleeding episodes in people receiving emicizumab as prophylactic treatment in the absence of anti-porcine FVIII antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.