ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2021
Comparison of Library of Plans with two daily adaptive strategies for whole bladder radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-specific adaptive planning margin for whole bladder radiation therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Clinical implementation of RTT-only CBCT-guided online adaptive focal radiotherapy for bladder cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Efficient strategy for magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy of rectal cancer using a library of reference plans.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy: Promising Results for Bladder Cancer Case.Cureus · 2024Article
- Bringing online adaptive radiotherapy to a standard C-arm linac.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- ESGO/ESTRO quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWhole bladder radiotherapy is challenging due to inter- and intrafraction size and shape changes. To account for these changes, currently a Library of Plans (LoP) technique is often applied, but daily adaptive radiotherapy is also increasingly becoming available. The aim of this study was to compare LoP with two magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) strategies by comparing target coverage and volume of healthy tissue inside the planning target volume (PTV) for whole bladder treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 25 MRgRT lymph node oligometastases treatments (125 fractions) were used, with three MRI scans acquired at each fraction at 0, 15 and 30 min. Bladders were delineated and used to evaluate three strategies: 1) LoP with two plans for a 15 min fraction, 2) MRgRT
resultsMRgRT
conclusionsTaking into account both target coverage and volume of healthy tissue inside the PTV, MRgRT
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.