ArticleCureus2021
Bio-Degradable Stents: Primary Experience in a Tertiary Hepatopancreaticobiliary Center in the United Kingdom.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Efficacy of Absorbable Biliary Stents for Benign Bile Duct Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Pooled it
- The safety and efficacy of the percutaneous balloon-expandable biodegradable magnesium biliary stents in patients with liver transplant.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Early Biodegradable Stent Placement for Percutaneous Hepaticojejunostomy Stricture Management.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement of benign biliary strictures (BBS) post bilioenteric anastomoses requires a multidisciplinary approach including surgical, radiological, and/or endoscopic input. Patients often need multiple hospital visits for treatment with the long-term possibility of restenosis. Conventionally BBS have been treated with serial percutaneous transhepatic biliary dilatations necessitating repeat procedures for drain exchange or removal. Surgery may become necessary in refractory strictures. In the last decade, there have been increasing reports of the use of biodegradable stents (BDS) in treating biliary strictures mainly to address the need for repeated procedures for drain exchange.
aimThis study aimed to report the early outcomes in patients with BBS treated with BDS.
methodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed in patients who had a bilioenteric anastomosis presenting with an anastomotic stricture and were intended to be treated with BDS. The primary endpoints reported were technical success (defined as a successful resolution of stricture on repeat cholangiogram) and clinical success (defined as the absence of repeated cholangitis). Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade of complication was reported.
resultsTwelve patients presented with BBS and nine patients had BDS. Three patients were not considered suitable for BDS due to a non-traversable stricture and had surgery. The male-female ratio was 1:2. There was 100% technical and clinical success with one patient having stent migration not needing intervention. The procedure took an average of 45 min. In seven (77.7%) patients, it was safely performed under local anesthesia with sedation. Two patients preferred general anesthesia. There was no restenosis noted at a median follow-up of 11 months.
conclusionThe use of BDS in the treatment of BBS is a safe and effective procedure. Longer-term follow-up with multi-institutional reporting on a national database is needed to assess its long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.