Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849264›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021

Participation of rural patients in clinical trials at a multisite academic medical center.

Adil E Bharucha, Chung Il Wi, Sushmitha Grama Srinivasan, Hyuckjae Choi, Phillip H Wheeler, Jennifer R Stavlund, Daniel A Keller, Kent R Bailey, Young J Juhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Recruiting Rural Patients for Clinical Research: Lessons From a Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Meeting People Where They Are: Strategies for Improving Rural Representation in Clinical Research through Pragmatic Clinical Trials.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Barriers to participation in clinical trials of rural older adult cancer survivors: A qualitative study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Improving Access to Patient-Focused, Decentralized Clinical Trials Requires Streamlined Regulatory Requirements: An ASCO Research Statement.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adil E BharuchaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Chung Il WiDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sushmitha Grama SrinivasanMayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Hyuckjae ChoiDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Phillip H WheelerDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jennifer R StavlundDepartment of Research Administration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Daniel A KellerEnterprise Application Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kent R BaileyDivision of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Young J JuhnDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical trials, which are mainly conducted in urban medical centers, may be less accessible to rural residents. Our aims were to assess participation and the factors associated with participation of rural residents in clinical trials.

methodsUsing geocoding, the residential address of participants enrolled into clinical trials at Mayo Clinic locations in Arizona, Florida, and the Midwest between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, was categorized as urban or rural. The distance travelled by participants and trial characteristics was compared between urban and rural participants. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate whether study location and risks were associated with rural participation in trials.

resultsAmong 292 trials, including 136 (47%) cancer trials, there were 2313 participants. Of these, 731 (32%) were rural participants, which is greater than the rural population in these 9 states (19%,

conclusionsApproximately one in three clinical trial participants were rural residents versus one in five in the population. Rural residents travelled further to access clinical trials. The study-associated risks were not associated with the distribution of rural and urban participants in trials.

Indexed as

Clinical trialgeocodingrecruitmentruralurban

Identifiers

PMID34849264
PMCPMC8596068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.