Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849263›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021

Stakeholder input on a care planning tool to address unhealthy behaviors, mental health needs, and social risks: The value of different stakeholder perspectives.

Kristen O'Loughlin, Alison N Huffstetler, Hannah Shadowen, E Marshall Brooks, Jennifer Hinesley, Amy G Huebschmann, Russell E Glasgow, Arline Bohannon, Alex H Krist

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kristen O'LoughlinDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-4238
Alison N HuffstetlerDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Hannah ShadowenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
E Marshall BrooksDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jennifer HinesleyDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Amy G HuebschmannDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Russell E GlasgowAdult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Arline BohannonDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Alex H KristDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health Related ResearchUL1TR002649 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2018 to 2022
$19.1M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS026223NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report describes how stakeholder groups informed a web-based care planning tool's development for addressing root causes of poor health. Stakeholders included community members (n = 6), researchers (n = 6), community care providers (n = 9), and patients (n = 17). Feedback was solicited through focus groups, semi-structured interviews, and user experience observations and then qualitatively analyzed to identify themes. Each group contributed a unique perspective. Researchers wanted evidence-based content; community members and providers focused on making goals manageable; patients wanted care team support and simple action-oriented language. Our findings highlight the benefits of stakeholder input. Blending perspectives from multiple groups results in a more robust intervention design.

Indexed as

Chronic diseasechronic disease managementcommunity-engaged researchhealth technologyintervention designpatient care planningstakeholder input

Identifiers

PMID34849263
PMCPMC8596059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.