ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021
"It has to be designed in a way that really challenges people's assumptions": preparing scholars to build equitable community research partnerships.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Institutional transformations for authentic community engaged and participatory research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- A Community Advisory Board's Role in Disseminating Tai Chi Prime in African American and Latinx Communities: A Pragmatic Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Design and implementation of a Community Expert Group comprised of people with lived expertise of homelessness at an academic health research center: a program description and analysis of challenges.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Respectful closure of a CEnR DNA integrity study: A bridge to sustained interactions with research participants.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Make me a match: Creating research partnerships to build capacity for the evaluation of community initiatives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches in vaccination promotion: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- A discussion among deans on advancing community engaged research.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- The community voices program to facilitate community-academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program's usefulness.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Win-win interactions: Results and implications of a user needs assessment of clinical and translational scientists.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinical and Translational Award (CTSA) programs are developing relevant training for researchers and community stakeholders participating in community-engaged research (CEnR). However, there is limited research exploring the ways community stakeholders and partners with key CEnR experiences can inform and shape training priorities for prospective CEnR scholars to build meaningful and equitable partnerships.
methodsThis study conducted and analyzed online individual semi-structured in-depth interviews with community stakeholders (
findingsThematic analysis of 13 interview transcripts revealed four major training priorities for prospective scholars interested in engaging in CEnR: 1) researcher's positionality, 2) equitable power sharing, 3) funding, and 4) ethics.
conclusionBuilding equitable research partnerships was a central theme woven across all four training priorities. Further research should focus on examining the development, implementation, and evaluation of CEnR training in partnership with community stakeholders and partners with relevant CEnR experience. Adopting a collaborative approach to incorporate both community stakeholders and researchers' priorities can align training competencies to better prepare scholars to engage in building research partnerships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.