ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021
Expanded analyses of the functional correlations within structural classifications of glycoside hydrolases.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Electrostatic potential as a reactivity scoring function in computer-assisted enzyme engineering.The FEBS journal · 2025Article
- Genome sequencing of a novel Verticillium dahliae strain (huangweibingjun).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genome Sequencing ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Quantifying functional redundancy in polysaccharide-degrading prokaryotic communities.Microbiome · 2024Article
- GDPF: a data resource for the distribution of prokaryotic protein families across the global biosphere.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Complete genome analysis of pathogenic Metschnikowia bicuspidata strain MQ2101 isolated from diseased ridgetail white prawn, Exopalaemon carinicauda.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) are greatly diverse in sequences and functions, but systematic studies of GH relationships based on structural information are lacking. Here, we report that GHs have multiple evolutionary origins and are structurally derived from 27 homologous superfamilies and 16 folds, but GHs are highly biased to distribute in a few superfamilies and folds. Six of these superfamilies are widely encoded by archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes, indicating that they may be the most ancient in origin. Most superfamilies vary in enzyme function, and some, such as the superfamilies of (β/α)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.