Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34848961›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2021

Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points.

Koyo Hashijiri, Yuichiro Watanabe, Naoki Fukui, Takaharu Motegi, Maki Ogawa, Jun Egawa, Takayuki Enomoto, Toshiyuki Someya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Koyo HashijiriDepartment of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2930-4580
Yuichiro WatanabeDepartment of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5496-5997
Naoki FukuiDepartment of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Takaharu MotegiDepartment of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Maki OgawaDepartment of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Jun EgawaDepartment of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Takayuki EnomotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-5541
Toshiyuki SomeyaDepartment of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIdentification of pregnant women with bonding difficulties is important to provide early intervention. However, few studies have examined the utility of self-report questionnaires that assess mother-infant bonding as screening tools for bonding difficulties. This longitudinal study aimed to identify pregnant women with bonding difficulties using the Japanese version of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS-J) and to estimate its optimal cutoff points in the peripartum period. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 1301 pregnant women completed the MIBS-J and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at three time points: first trimester (T1; approximately 12-15 weeks gestation), third trimester (T2; approximately 30-34 weeks gestation), and postpartum (T3; approximately 4 weeks postpartum). A two-step cluster analysis was conducted to classify pregnant women based on their MIBS-J subscale scores at the three time points. Based on the cluster analysis results, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to estimate the optimal cutoff scores for the MIBS-J total score at each time point.

resultsThe two-step cluster analysis produced two clusters: Cluster 1 (n = 824) and Cluster 2 (n = 477). Both the MIBS-J and HADS scores were significantly higher in Cluster 2 than in Cluster 1 at all time points. The MIBS-J tentative cutoff points were 3/4, 3/4, and 2/3 at T1, T2, and T3, respectively.

conclusionWe identified two distinct groups across the perinatal period: pregnant women with bonding difficulties and pregnant women with normal bonding. Our findings suggest the usefulness of the MIBS-J as a screening tool to identify bonding difficulties during pregnancy.

Indexed as

bonding difficultiescluster analysisHADSMIBS-JROC analysis

Identifiers

PMID34848961
PMCPMC8616728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.