Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34848883›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2022

Studying osteoarthritis with artificial intelligence applied to magnetic resonance imaging.

Francesco Calivà, Nikan K Namiri, Maureen Dubreuil, Valentina Pedoia, Eugene Ozhinsky, Sharmila Majumdar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Emerging therapies for knee osteoarthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Case Report: Osteomyelitis in a giant panda (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  15. Minimally Invasive Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Deep learning in rheumatological image interpretation.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco Calivà *Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging and Center for Intelligent Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0425-7511
Nikan K Namiri *Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging and Center for Intelligent Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2943-9546
Maureen DubreuilSection of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Valentina PedoiaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging and Center for Intelligent Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Eugene OzhinskyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging and Center for Intelligent Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8993-7905
Sharmila MajumdarDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging and Center for Intelligent Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Sharmila.Majumdar@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0201-871X
University of California, San Francisco · USBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 3D nature and soft-tissue contrast of MRI makes it an invaluable tool for osteoarthritis research, by facilitating the elucidation of disease pathogenesis and progression. The recent increasing employment of MRI has certainly been stimulated by major advances that are due to considerable investment in research, particularly related to artificial intelligence (AI). These AI-related advances are revolutionizing the use of MRI in clinical research by augmenting activities ranging from image acquisition to post-processing. Automation is key to reducing the long acquisition times of MRI, conducting large-scale longitudinal studies and quantitatively defining morphometric and other important clinical features of both soft and hard tissues in various anatomical joints. Deep learning methods have been used recently for multiple applications in the musculoskeletal field to improve understanding of osteoarthritis. Compared with labour-intensive human efforts, AI-based methods have advantages and potential in all stages of imaging, as well as post-processing steps, including aiding diagnosis and prognosis. However, AI-based methods also have limitations, including the arguably limited interpretability of AI models. Given that the AI community is highly invested in uncovering uncertainties associated with model predictions and improving their interpretability, we envision future clinical translation and progressive increase in the use of AI algorithms to support clinicians in optimizing patient care.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal SystemOsteoarthritisAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID34848883
OpenAlexW3217103211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.