Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34848534›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Genomic evidence for inbreeding depression and purging of deleterious genetic variation in Indian tigers.

Anubhab Khan, Kaushalkumar Patel, Harsh Shukla, Ashwin Viswanathan, Tom van der Valk, Udayan Borthakur, Parag Nigam, Arun Zachariah, Yadavendradev V Jhala, Marty Kardos and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anubhab KhanNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India; anubhabkhan@gmail.com martin.kardos@noaa.gov uramakri@ncbs.res.in.ORCID 0000-0002-6342-6522
Kaushalkumar PatelNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India.
Harsh ShuklaNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India.
Ashwin ViswanathanNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1605-0614
Tom van der ValkSwedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm 4011418, Sweden.
Udayan BorthakurAranyak, Guwahati 781028, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5608-8142
Parag NigamWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun 248001, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9472-6897
Arun ZachariahKerala Forest Department, Wayanad 670645, India.
Yadavendradev V JhalaWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun 248001, India.
Marty KardosNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA 98112; anubhabkhan@gmail.com martin.kardos@noaa.gov uramakri@ncbs.res.in.ORCID 0000-0002-7587-3004
Uma RamakrishnanNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India; anubhabkhan@gmail.com martin.kardos@noaa.gov uramakri@ncbs.res.in.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-5966
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research · INWildlife Institute of India · INNOAA National Marine Fisheries Service · USSwedish Museum of Natural History · SE

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/S/16/2/502714Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing habitat fragmentation leads to wild populations becoming small, isolated, and threatened by inbreeding depression. However, small populations may be able to purge recessive deleterious alleles as they become expressed in homozygotes, thus reducing inbreeding depression and increasing population viability. We used whole-genome sequences from 57 tigers to estimate individual inbreeding and mutation load in a small-isolated and two large-connected populations in India. As expected, the small-isolated population had substantially higher average genomic inbreeding (

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomicsInbreedingAnimal DistributionAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesGenomeIndiaTigersconservation genomicslarge carnivorenatural selectionpurifying selectionsmall population size

Identifiers

PMID34848534
PMCPMC8670471
OpenAlexW3217569658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.