Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34848516›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.

Kirsty Roberts, Nicola Mills, Chris Metcalfe, Athene Lane, Clare Clement, William Hollingworth, Jodi Taylor, Chris Holcombe, Joanna Skillman, Katherine Fairhurst and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Kirsty RobertsPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0765-3752
Nicola MillsPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Chris MetcalfePopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8318-8907
Athene LanePopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Clare ClementPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5555-433X
William HollingworthPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Jodi TaylorPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Chris HolcombeLinda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Joanna SkillmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Katherine FairhurstPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Lisa WhiskerNottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Ramsey CutressCancer Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Steven ThrushBreast Unit, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, Worcestershire, UK.
Patricia FairbrotherIndependent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.
Shelley PotterPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK shelley.potter@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-312X
University of Bristol · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBThe Patients Association · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBWorcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2016-16-019Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure following mastectomy. IBBR techniques are evolving rapidly, with mesh-assisted subpectoral reconstruction becoming the standard of care and more recently, prepectoral techniques being introduced. These muscle-sparing techniques may reduce postoperative pain, avoid implant animation and improve cosmetic outcomes and have been widely adopted into practice. Although small observational studies have failed to demonstrate any differences in the clinical or patient-reported outcomes of prepectoral or subpectoral reconstruction, high-quality comparative evidence of clinical or cost-effectiveness is lacking. A well-designed, adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare the techniques, but breast reconstruction RCTs are challenging. We, therefore, aim to undertake an external pilot RCT (Best-BRA) with an embedded QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to determine the feasibility of undertaking a trial comparing prepectoral and subpectoral techniques. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Best-BRA is a pragmatic, two-arm, external pilot RCT with an embedded QRI and economic scoping for resource use. Women who require a mastectomy for either breast cancer or risk reduction, elect to have an IBBR and are considered suitable for both prepectoral and subpectoral reconstruction will be recruited and randomised 1:1 between the techniques.The QRI will be implemented in two phases: phase 1, in which sources of recruitment difficulties are rapidly investigated to inform the delivery in phase 2 of tailored interventions to optimise recruitment of patients.Primary outcomes will be (1) recruitment of patients, (2) adherence to trial allocation and (3) outcome completion rates. Outcomes will be reviewed at 12 months to determine the feasibility of a definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the National Health Service (NHS) Wales REC 6 (20/WA/0338). Findings will be presented at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10081873.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastyFemaleHumansMastectomyPilot ProjectsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbreast surgerybreast tumoursplastic & reconstructive surgeryqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34848516
PMCPMC8634330
OpenAlexW3209150533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.