ArticleBMJ open2021
Core outcome set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG): an international, consensus-derived and multistakeholder initiative.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effectiveness of educational, behavioural, and cognitive self-management support interventions for chronic migraine: a systematic review.Primary health care research & development · 2025Pooled it
- Bridging the gap between evidence and clinical practice for migraine headaches: a systematic review (2019-2024).The journal of headache and pain · 2025Pooled it
- European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention - part 4: propranolol.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for managing chronic migraine in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention - part 3: topiramate.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention-part 2: flunarizine.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- Analysis of outcome reporting in common peroneal neuropathy studies: a systematic review of the literature.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Pooled it
- The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- Non-pharmacological interventions for prophylaxis of vestibular migraine.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for prophylaxis of vestibular migraine.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for acute attacks of vestibular migraine.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention-part 1: amitriptyline.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- An international Delphi survey and consensus meeting to define the core outcome set for trigeminal neuralgia clinical trials.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Does pain self-efficacy predict, moderate or mediate outcomes in people with chronic headache; an exploratory analysis of the CHESS trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Trial
- Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial.Neurology · 2023Trial
- Magnesium supplementation for migraine prophylaxis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: A qualitative study on the views of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Core Outcome Sets for Pain Disorders: A Systematic Review of Research and Reporting Quality.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Considerations Around the Inclusion of Children and Young People's Time in Economic Evaluation: Findings from an International Delphi Study.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Developing consensus on core outcome sets of domains for acute, the transition from acute to chronic, recurrent/episodic, and chronic pain: results of the INTEGRATE-pain Delphi process.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTypically, migraine prevention trials focus on reducing migraine days. This narrow focus may not capture all that is important to people with migraine. Inconsistency in outcome selection across trials limits the potential for data pooling and evidence synthesis. In response, we describe the development of core outcome set for migraine (COSMIG).
designA two-stage approach sought to achieve international, multistakeholder consensus on both the core domain set and core measurement set. Following construction of a comprehensive list of outcomes, expert panellists (patients, healthcare professionals and researchers) completed a three-round electronic-Delphi study to support a reduction and prioritisation of core domains and outcomes. Participants in a consensus meeting finalised the core domains and methods of assessment. All stages were overseen by an international core team, including patient research partners.
resultsThere was a good representation of patients (episodic migraine (n=34) and chronic migraine (n=42)) and healthcare professionals (n=33) with high response and retention rates. The initial list of domains and outcomes was reduced from >50 to 7 core domains for consideration in the consensus meeting, during which a 2-domain core outcome set was agreed.
conclusionInternational and multistakeholder consensus emerged to describe a two-domain core outcome set for reporting research on preventive interventions for chronic and episodic migraine: migraine-specific pain and migraine-specific quality of life. Intensity of migraine pain assessed with an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale and the frequency as the number of headache/migraine days over a specified time period. Migraine-specific quality of life assessed using the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.