Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34848298›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Capturing the nature of events and event context using hierarchical event descriptors (HED).

Kay Robbins, Dung Truong, Stefan Appelhoff, Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. NEMAR: an open access data, tools and compute resource operating on neuroelectromagnetic data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kay RobbinsDepartment of Computer Science, University of Texas San Antonio San Antonio, TX, United States. Electronic address: Kay.Robbins@utsa.edu.
Dung TruongSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States.
Stefan AppelhoffCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Arnaud DelormeSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States; Paul Sabatier University in Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Scott MakeigSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States.

Funding

EEGLAB: Software for Analysis of Human Brain DynamicsR01NS047293 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig · 2004 to 2026
$10.2M
BRAIN INITIATIVE RESOURCE: DEVELOPMENT OF A HUMAN NEUROELECTROMAGNETIC DATA ARCHIVE AND TOOLS RESOURCE (NEMAR)R24MH120037 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Arnaud Delorme, Amitava Majumdar · 2019 to 2026
$5.5M
The Open EEGLAB Portal ProjectR01EB023297 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DELORME, ARNAUD, MAJUMDAR, AMITAVA · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
BRAIN Initiative: Assessing development of event-related cortical network dynamicsRF1MH125934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DELORME, ARNAUD, MAKEIG, SCOTT · 2021 to 2021
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023297NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH120037NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH125934NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event-related data analysis plays a central role in EEG and MEG (MEEG) and other neuroimaging modalities including fMRI. Choices about which events to report and how to annotate their full natures significantly influence the value, reliability, and reproducibility of neuroimaging datasets for further analysis and meta- or mega-analysis. A powerful annotation strategy using the new third-generation formulation of the Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED) framework and tools (hedtags.org) combines robust event description with details of experiment design and metadata in a human-readable as well as machine-actionable form, making event annotation relevant to the full range of neuroimaging and other time series data. This paper considers the event design and annotation process using as a case study the well-known multi-subject, multimodal dataset of Wakeman and Henson made available by its authors as a Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) dataset (bids.neuroimaging.io). We propose a set of best practices and guidelines for event annotation integrated in a natural way into the BIDS metadata file architecture, examine the impact of event design decisions, and provide a working example of organizing events in MEEG and other neuroimaging data. We demonstrate how annotations using HED can document events occurring during neuroimaging experiments as well as their interrelationships, providing machine-actionable annotation enabling automated within- and across-experiment analysis and comparisons. We discuss the evolution of HED software tools and have made available an accompanying HED-annotated BIDS-formated edition of the MEEG data of the Wakeman and Henson dataset (openneuro.org, ds003645).

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicElectroencephalographyFacial RecognitionFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetoencephalographyNeurosciencesResearch DesignBIDSEEGEvent annotationEventsHEDHED-3GHierarchical event descriptorsMEGTime series

Identifiers

PMID34848298
PMCPMC8925904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.