Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847984›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2022

Comparison of Gelatin Flavors for Oral Dosing of C57BL/6J and FVB/N Mice.

Tânia Martins, Ana F Matos, Joana Soares, Rúben Leite, Maria J Pires, Tiago Ferreira, Beatriz Medeiros-Fonseca, Eduardo Rosa, Paula A Oliveira, Luís M Antunes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy of Supplemental Diet Gels for Preventing Postoperative Weight Loss in Mice (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tânia MartinsCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Ana F MatosDepartment of Biology and Environment, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Trás-os Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Joana SoaresDepartment of Biology and Environment, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Trás-os Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Rúben LeiteDepartment of Biology and Environment, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Trás-os Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Maria J PiresCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Tiago FerreiraCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Beatriz Medeiros-FonsecaCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Eduardo RosaCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Paula A OliveiraCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Luís M AntunesCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise oral dosing in rodents is usually achieved by intragastric gavage. If performed incorrectly due to technical difficulties, inexperience, or animal resistance, oral gavage may have animal welfare implications such as esophageal and gastric rupture and aspiration. The stress that is induced by this procedure can also lead to confounding results. In several animal models, drug vehicles must be sugar-free, deliver drugs in a specific formulation, and sometimes supply water. Gelatin has all of these properties. The current study aimed to evaluate the use of gelatin vehicles with different sensory features as an alternative to oral gavage. We investigated the time taken by 2 different inbred mouse strains, FVB/N and C57BL/6J, to ingest sugar-free gelatin pellets of varying flavors. Results showed that FVB/N mice took more time to eat the unflavored, strawberry and diet-flavored gelatin pellets than did C57BL/6J mice. Both strains showed low preference for lemon flavor, with the same ingestion times after the second day. This study showed that the C57BL/6J mice are more likely to eat gelatin than are FVB/N mice, and that the 2 strains of mice show a lower preference for lemon flavoring as compared with other flavors. This method of voluntarily oral administration offers an alternative to gavage for studies that use oral dosing studies.

Indexed as

Flavoring AgentsFoodGelatinAdministration, OralAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred StrainsFlavoring AgentsGelatin

Identifiers

PMID34847984
PMCPMC8786383
OpenAlexW3217399806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.