Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847916›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Collective imaginaries of caring landscapes for rural youth: a concept mapping study in northern Sweden.

Frida Jonsson, Monica Christianson, Maria Wiklund, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Isabel Goicolea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frida JonssonDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. frida.jonsson@umu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5902-3798
Monica ChristiansonDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1003-1655
Maria WiklundArctic Research Centre (Arcum) at Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6636-9597
Anna-Karin HurtigDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7087-1467
Isabel GoicoleaDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8114-4705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the current study, the approach of 'utopia as method' was combined with the concept 'landscapes of care' to explore collective imaginaries of caring landscapes in relation to young people living in rural northern Sweden, while focusing specifically on what such landscapes should ideally look like, and how various strategies could help to realise the visions.

methodsThe research was conducted using a modified concept mapping methodology comprising three phases of data collection and analysis. This facilitated the integration of tacit knowledge and utopian visions of young people, professionals and policymakers living and working in various parts of northern Sweden.

resultsThe results indicated that caring landscapes should: 'provide services responsive to young people's wishes and needs', 'be organised around values of safety, equity and youth participation', and 'rework metro-centredness' in order to care for, with and about rural youth.

conclusionsThe findings can be viewed as an imaginary reconstitution of communities in rural northern Sweden, but also as hypothetical building blocks to be used for developing caring landscapes and a 'good countryside' where young people have the possibility to live a good life in decent health.

Indexed as

Health ServicesRural PopulationAdolescentHealth Services AccessibilityHumansResearch DesignSwedenConcept mappingLandscapes of careNorthern SwedenRuralUtopia as methodYouth

Identifiers

PMID34847916
PMCPMC8638169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.