Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847875›Full record

Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2021

Impact of extent of coronary artery disease and percutaneous revascularization assessed by the SYNTAX score on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Tilman Stephan, Eva Thoma, Manuel Rattka, Dominik Felbel, Dominik Buckert, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Birgid Gonska, Sinisa Markovic

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tilman StephanDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Eva ThomaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Manuel RattkaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Dominik FelbelDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Dominik BuckertDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Wolfgang RottbauerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Birgid Gonska *Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Sinisa Markovic *Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. sinisa.markovic@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to analyze the impact of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) assessed by the SYNTAX score (SS) and periprocedural percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

backgroundDue to controversial data regarding the effect of CAD on outcomes after TAVR, proper revascularization strategies remain a matter of debate.

methods553 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR were included in this study. SS was calculated for each patient at baseline and after PCI. Primary outcome was one-year all-cause mortality.

results60.2% of patients (N = 333) exhibited CAD with a mean SS of 10.8 ± 8.8. Of those, 120 patients (36.0%) received periprocedural PCI. In the treatment group, mean SS was decreased from 14.9 ± 9.1 to 6.3 ± 6.7. Patients with concomitant CAD suffered more frequently from myocardial infarction (MI) post TAVR compared to those without CAD (2.1% vs. 0.0%; P < 0.01). In the CAD cohort, MI rates were comparable between patients with and without PCI (2.2% vs. 2.5%; P = 0.71). Regarding SS, patients with a residual SS < 8 showed significant lower rates of one-year mortality (9.0% vs. 18.2%; P = 0.016) and MACCE (16.5% vs. 32.2%; P = 0.001). Besides left bundle brunch, predictors for an increased one-year mortality were a residual SS ≥ 8 in the CAD group (OR = 3.17; P = 0.011) and a EuroSCORE ≥ 4% in the entire study population (OR = 2.18; P = 0.017).

conclusionOur results suggest that a residual SS-guided revascularization strategy may improve prognosis after TAVR in patients with concomitant CAD. PCI aiming for a residual SS < 8 was associated with improved one-year clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAortic stenosisAortic valve diseaseCoronary artery diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous valve therapyTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID34847875
PMCPMC8638523
OpenAlexW3215616742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.