ArticleBMC pediatrics2021
Major heart defects: the diagnostic evaluations of first-year-olds.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning for cardiac CT segmentation for congenital heart disease: A systematic review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Necrotising enterocolitis and mortality in very preterm babies with severe congenital heart disease.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies and Predictive Factors in Pregnant Women in Bahrain: A Retrospective Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Missed or Delayed Diagnosis of Heart Disease by the General Pediatrician.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effects of antibiotics, hospitalisation and surgical complications on self-reported immunological vulnerability following paediatric open-heart surgery and thymectomy: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSevere or critical congenital heart defects (CHDs) constitute one third of the heart defect cases detected only after birth. These prenatally unrecognised defects usually manifest as cyanotic or acyanotic lesions and are diagnosed postnatally at various times. The aim of the study was to identify their clinical symptoms and determine individual risk periods for CHD manifestation.
methodsData were assessed retrospectively based on a cohort of patients born between 2009 and 2018 in a population of 175,153 live births. Occurrence of the first symptoms of CHD was classified into: early neonatal (0-7 days), late neonatal (8-28 days), early infancy (1-6 months), or late infancy (6-12 months). The first symptom for which the child was referred to a paediatric cardiologist was defined as a symptom of CHD.
resultsThere were 598 major CHDs diagnosed in the studied region, 91% of which were isolated anomalies. A concomitant genetic disorder was diagnosed in 6% of the cases, while 3% presented extracardiac pathology with a normal karyotype. In total, 47% (282/598) of all CHDs were not identified prenatally. Of these, 74% (210/282) were diagnosed as early neonates, 16% (44/282) as late neonates, and 10% (28/282) as infants. The most common symptoms leading to the diagnosis of CHD were heart murmur (51%, 145/282) and cyanosis (26%, 73/282). Diagnosis after discharge from the hospital occurred in 12% (72/598) of all major CHDs. Ventricular septal defect and coarctation of the aorta constituted the majority of delayed diagnoses.
conclusionsIn conclusion, murmur and cyanosis are the most common manifestations of prenatally undetected CHDs. Although most children with major CHDs are diagnosed as neonates, some patients are still discharged from the maternity hospital with an unidentified defect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.