Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847867›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2021

Major heart defects: the diagnostic evaluations of first-year-olds.

Jan Pavlicek, Eva Klaskova, Sabina Kapralova, Alzbeta Moravova Palatova, Alicja Piegzova, Richard Spacek, Tomas Gruszka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan PavlicekDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic. jan.pavlicek@fno.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-5473-6855
Eva KlaskovaDepartment of Pediatrics, Palacky University Hospital, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Sabina KapralovaDepartment of Pediatrics, Palacky University Hospital, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Alzbeta Moravova PalatovaDepartment of Pediatrics, Palacky University Hospital, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Alicja PiegzovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Richard SpacekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Tomas GruszkaDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere or critical congenital heart defects (CHDs) constitute one third of the heart defect cases detected only after birth. These prenatally unrecognised defects usually manifest as cyanotic or acyanotic lesions and are diagnosed postnatally at various times. The aim of the study was to identify their clinical symptoms and determine individual risk periods for CHD manifestation.

methodsData were assessed retrospectively based on a cohort of patients born between 2009 and 2018 in a population of 175,153 live births. Occurrence of the first symptoms of CHD was classified into: early neonatal (0-7 days), late neonatal (8-28 days), early infancy (1-6 months), or late infancy (6-12 months). The first symptom for which the child was referred to a paediatric cardiologist was defined as a symptom of CHD.

resultsThere were 598 major CHDs diagnosed in the studied region, 91% of which were isolated anomalies. A concomitant genetic disorder was diagnosed in 6% of the cases, while 3% presented extracardiac pathology with a normal karyotype. In total, 47% (282/598) of all CHDs were not identified prenatally. Of these, 74% (210/282) were diagnosed as early neonates, 16% (44/282) as late neonates, and 10% (28/282) as infants. The most common symptoms leading to the diagnosis of CHD were heart murmur (51%, 145/282) and cyanosis (26%, 73/282). Diagnosis after discharge from the hospital occurred in 12% (72/598) of all major CHDs. Ventricular septal defect and coarctation of the aorta constituted the majority of delayed diagnoses.

conclusionsIn conclusion, murmur and cyanosis are the most common manifestations of prenatally undetected CHDs. Although most children with major CHDs are diagnosed as neonates, some patients are still discharged from the maternity hospital with an unidentified defect.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalHeart Septal Defects, VentricularChildCohort StudiesCyanosisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCongenital heart defectCyanosisMurmurSymptom

Identifiers

PMID34847867
PMCPMC8630885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.