Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847864›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care.

N A du Fossé, E E L O Lashley, T T Treurniet, J M M van Lith, S le Cessie, H Boosman, M L P van der Hoorn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N A du FosséDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands. n.a.du_fosse@lumc.nl.
E E L O LashleyDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
T T TreurnietDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
J M M van LithDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
S le CessieDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
H BoosmanDepartment of Quality and Patient Safety, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
M L P van der HoornDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational guidelines recommend to offer supportive care during a next pregnancy to couples affected by recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). In previous research, several options for supportive care have been identified and women's preferences have been quantified. Although it is known that RPL impacts the mental health of both partners, male preferences for supportive care have hardly been explored.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in couples who visited a specialized RPL clinic in the Netherlands between November 2018 and December 2019. Both members of the couples received a questionnaire that quantified their preferences for supportive care in a next pregnancy and they were asked to complete this independently from each other. Preferences for each supportive care option were analysed on a group level (by gender) and on a couple level, by comparing preferences of both partners.

resultsNinety-two questionnaires (completed by 46 couples) were analysed. The overall need for supportive care indicated on a scale from 1 to 10 was 6.8 for men and 7.9 for women (P = 0.002). Both genders preferred to regularly see the same doctor with knowledge of their obstetric history, to make a plan for the first trimester and to have frequent ultrasound examinations. A lower proportion of men preferred a doctor that shows understanding (80% of men vs. 100% of women, P = 0.004) and a doctor that informs on wellbeing (72% vs. 100%, P = ≤0.000). Fewer men preferred support from friends (48% vs. 74%, P = 0.017). Thirty-seven percent of men requested more involvement of the male partner at the outpatient clinic, compared to 70% of women (P = 0.007). In 28% of couples, partners had opposing preferences regarding peer support.

conclusionsWhile both women and men affected by RPL are in need of supportive care, their preferences may differ. Current supportive care services may not entirely address the needs of men. Health care professionals should focus on both partners and development of novel supportive care programs with specific attention for men should be considered.

Indexed as

Prenatal CarePsychosocial Support SystemsAbortion, HabitualAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFathersFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPatient PreferencePregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesMale perspectiveRecurrent miscarriageRecurrent pregnancy lossSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID34847864
PMCPMC8630871
OpenAlexW3217142374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.