Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847422›Full record

ReviewTranslational oncology2022

Tumor treating fields: An emerging treatment modality for thoracic and abdominal cavity cancers.

Travis H Jones, Jonathan W Song, Laith Abushahin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Study on the electric field transmission characteristics of conducted-electrode tumor treating fields].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  5. Synergistic effects of combined hyperthermia and electric fields treatment in non-small cell lung-cancer (NSCLC) cell lines.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Travis H JonesDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, 201W. 19th Avenue, E406 Scott Laboratory, Columbus, OH 43210, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, 1800 Canon Drive, 1300G, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Jonathan W SongDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, 201W. 19th Avenue, E406 Scott Laboratory, Columbus, OH 43210, United States; Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States. Electronic address: song.1069@osu.edu.
Laith AbushahinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, 1800 Canon Drive, 1300G, Columbus, OH 43210, United States; Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States. Electronic address: laith.abushahin@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Biophysical-based approach for controlling blood vessel structure and functionR01HL141941 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CASTRO, CARLOS E., PRAKASH, SHAURYA · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor treating fields (TTFields)-an intermediate-frequency, electric field therapy-has emerged as a promising alternative therapy for the treatment of solid cancers. Since the first publication describing the anticancer effects of TTFields in 2004 there have been numerous follow-up studies by other groups, either to confirm the efficacy of TTFields or to study the primary mechanism of interaction. The overwhelming conclusion from these in vitro studies is that TTFields reduce the viability of aggressively replicating cell lines. However, there is still speculation as to the primary mechanism for this effect; moreover, observations both in vitro and in vivo of inhibited migration and metastases have been made, which may be unrelated to the originally proposed hypothesis of replication stress. Adding to this, the in vivo environment is much more complex spatially, structurally, and involves intricate networks of cell signaling, all of which could change the efficacy of TTFields in the same way pharmaceutical interventions often struggle transitioning in vivo. Despite this, TTFields have shown promise in clinical practice on multiple cancer types, which begs the question: has the primary mechanism carried over from in vitro to in vivo or are there new mechanisms at play? The goal of this review is to highlight the current proposed mechanism of action of TTFields based primarily on in vitro experiments and animal models, provide a summary of the clinical efficacy of TTFields, and finally, propose future directions of research to identify all possible mechanisms in vivo utilizing novel tumor-on-a-chip platforms.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic fieldsPhysical oncologyThoracic and abdominal cavity cancerTTFieldsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34847422
PMCPMC8633677
OpenAlexW3217627552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.