Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847225›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2022

Nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibody signatures in patients with hemophilia A and in healthy donors.

Helmut Schweiger, Judit Rejtő, Christoph J Hofbauer, Verena Berg, Peter Allacher, Karl Zwiauer, Clemens Feistritzer, Gerhard Schuster, Cihan Ay, Birgit M Reipert and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Immunogenicity of Current and New Therapies for Hemophilia A.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Nonneutralizing Antibodies in Haemophilia A Patients: To Be Ignored or Not to Be!Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Helmut SchweigerInstitute Krems Bioanalytics, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3217-4454
Judit RejtőClinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph J HofbauerDrug Discovery Austria, Baxalta Innovations GmbH, a member of the Takeda group of companies, Vienna, Austria.
Verena BergInstitute Krems Bioanalytics, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3246-2317
Peter AllacherInstitute Krems Bioanalytics, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Krems, Austria.
Karl ZwiauerClinical Division of Pediatrics, University Hospital St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria.
Clemens FeistritzerDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Haematology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; and.ORCID 0000-0001-5182-7217
Gerhard SchusterUpper Austrian Red Cross, Linz, Austria.
Cihan AyClinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-9717
Birgit M ReipertInstitute Krems Bioanalytics, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7455-4610
Ingrid PabingerClinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATAustrian Red Cross · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATTakeda (Austria) · ATUniversitätsklinikum St. Pölten · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies identified nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies in the circulation of severe and nonsevere hemophilia A (sHA and nsHA) patients without FVIII inhibitors and also in some healthy individuals. To gain a better understanding of the nature of these nonneutralizing antibody responses, we analyzed and compared anti-FVIII antibody signatures in 3 study cohorts: previously treated sHA as well as nsHA patients without FVIII inhibitors, and healthy donors. FVIII-binding IgM, IgG1-4, and IgA antibodies were differentiated, FVIII-specificity was assessed, and associated apparent affinity constants were determined. Our results indicate that the nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibody response in all study cohorts is dominated by IgG1 and IgA. Prevalences, titers, and affinities of these nonneutralizing antibodies were higher in the hemophilia A cohorts than in healthy donors. Stratification for the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody status demonstrated the presence of FVIII-specific IgA with elevated titers in sHA patients with an active or past HCV infection when compared with HCV antibody-positive nsHA patients or HCV antibody-negative patients and healthy donors. Increased titers and affinities of FVIII-specific IgG1 antibodies were observed in a considerable number of hemophilia A patients as opposed to healthy subjects independently of the patients' anti-HCV antibody status. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that the generation of nonneutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies in healthy individuals and in noninhibitor hemophilia A patients might be based on similar immune mechanisms. However, differences in prevalences, titers, and affinities of these antibodies indicate distinct differences in the antibody evolution between healthy individuals and patients.

Indexed as

Hemophilia AHepatitis CFactor VIIIHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GFactor VIIIImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID34847225
PMCPMC8945293
OpenAlexW3216390587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.