Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847108›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2021

Understanding Preoperative Breast Satisfaction among Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction: BREAST-Q Insights.

Meghana G Shamsunder, Thais O Polanco, Colleen M McCarthy, Robert J Allen, Evan Matros, Michelle Coriddi, Babak J Mehrara, Andrea Pusic, Jonas A Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preoperative Expectations of Women Undergoing Breast Reconstruction Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Update and Trends in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy].Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V... · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meghana G ShamsunderFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Thais O PolancoFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Colleen M McCarthyFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Robert J AllenFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Evan MatrosFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Michelle CoriddiFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Babak J MehraraFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Andrea PusicFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Jonas A NelsonFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to present normative values for satisfaction with breasts among preoperative breast reconstruction patients as assessed using the BREAST-Q instrument and to delineate factors associated with preoperative breast satisfaction.

methodsA retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed examining women undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction at a tertiary care center who preoperatively completed the BREAST-Q from 2010 to 2017. Because breast satisfaction scores were nonnormally distributed, scores were categorized into quartiles for analysis. Patient- and treatment-level variables were tested in a multivariable ordinal logistic regression model as predictors of breast satisfaction. Preoperative satisfaction was also tested for association with choice of reconstructive modality.

resultsAmong 1306 postmastectomy reconstruction patients included in the study, mean preoperative Satisfaction with Breasts score was 61.8 ± 21.5 and the median score was 58.0 (interquartile range, 48 to 70). Factors associated with significantly lower preoperative satisfaction included history of psychiatric diagnosis, preoperative radiotherapy, marital status (married), and higher body mass index. Factors associated with significantly higher scores were malignancy (localized tumor), medium bra size (B to C cup), and self-identification as black. Preoperative breast satisfaction was lower among patients who elected autologous reconstruction than among those with implant reconstruction (p < 0.001).

conclusionsPreoperative breast satisfaction is influenced by multiple factors. Understanding these factors may improve preoperative counseling and expectation management for patients who undergo postmastectomy breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Indexed as

MammaplastyPersonal SatisfactionAdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsCounselingFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedMotivationNeoadjuvant TherapyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID34847108
PMCPMC8638966
OpenAlexW3215249197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.