Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847061›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

A Deep Learning Approach to Refine the Identification of High-Quality Clinical Research Articles From the Biomedical Literature: Protocol for Algorithm Development and Validation.

Wael Abdelkader, Tamara Navarro, Rick Parrish, Chris Cotoi, Federico Germini, Lori-Ann Linkins, Alfonso Iorio, R Brian Haynes, Sophia Ananiadou, Lingyang Chu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wael AbdelkaderHealth Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9581-1521
Tamara NavarroHealth Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-6942
Rick ParrishHealth Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3809-6015
Chris CotoiHealth Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7029-0582
Federico GerminiHealth Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0802-3616
Lori-Ann LinkinsDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9308-173X
Alfonso IorioHealth Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3331-8766
R Brian HaynesHealth Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1453-3196
Sophia Ananiadou *Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-9191
Lingyang ChuDepartment of Computing and Software, Faculty of Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8937-1750
Cynthia LokkerHealth Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-4290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA barrier to practicing evidence-based medicine is the rapidly increasing body of biomedical literature. Use of method terms to limit the search can help reduce the burden of screening articles for clinical relevance; however, such terms are limited by their partial dependence on indexing terms and usually produce low precision, especially when high sensitivity is required. Machine learning has been applied to the identification of high-quality literature with the potential to achieve high precision without sacrificing sensitivity. The use of artificial intelligence has shown promise to improve the efficiency of identifying sound evidence.

objectiveThe primary objective of this research is to derive and validate deep learning machine models using iterations of Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) to retrieve high-quality, high-relevance evidence for clinical consideration from the biomedical literature.

methodsUsing the HuggingFace Transformers library, we will experiment with variations of BERT models, including BERT, BioBERT, BlueBERT, and PubMedBERT, to determine which have the best performance in article identification based on quality criteria. Our experiments will utilize a large data set of over 150,000 PubMed citations from 2012 to 2020 that have been manually labeled based on their methodological rigor for clinical use. We will evaluate and report on the performance of the classifiers in categorizing articles based on their likelihood of meeting quality criteria. We will report fine-tuning hyperparameters for each model, as well as their performance metrics, including recall (sensitivity), specificity, precision, accuracy, F-score, the number of articles that need to be read before finding one that is positive (meets criteria), and classification probability scores.

resultsInitial model development is underway, with further development planned for early 2022. Performance testing is expected to star in February 2022. Results will be published in 2022.

conclusionsThe experiments will aim to improve the precision of retrieving high-quality articles by applying a machine learning classifier to PubMed searching. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/29398.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsbiomedicalevidence-based medicineliteratureliterature retrievalliterature surveillancemachine learningmedical informaticsmodel developmentnatural language processingNLP

Identifiers

PMID34847061
PMCPMC8669577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.