Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34846698›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2021

Efficacy and Safety of Washed Microbiota Transplantation to Treat Patients with Mild-to-Severe COVID-19 and Suspected of Having Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Li-Hao Wu, Zhi-Ning Ye, Ping Peng, Wen-Rui Xie, Jia-Ting Xu, Xue-Yuan Zhang, Harry Hua-Xiang Xia, Xing-Xiang He

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Regulation of SARS-CoV-2 infection by diet-modulated gut microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Hao Wu *Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zhi-Ning Ye *Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Ping PengGuangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Wen-Rui XieDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jia-Ting XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xue-Yuan ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Harry Hua-Xiang XiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xing-Xiang HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. hexingxiang@gdpu.edu.cn.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University · CNGuangzhou Eighth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is often accompanied by gastrointestinal symptoms, which are related to gut microbiota dysbiosis (GMD). Whether washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) is an effective treatment for COVID-19 patients suspected of having GMD by restoring the gut microbiota is unknown. This study is designed to explore the efficacy and safety of WMT in COVID-19 patients suspected of having GMD.

methodsThis is a randomized, multicenter, single-blind prospective study. COVID-19 patients suspected of having GMD will be randomly divided to receive routine treatment only or to receive routine treatment and WMT. The frequency of WMT will be once a day for three consecutive days. Laboratory and imaging examinations will be performed at admission, 1 and 2 weeks after treatment, and on the day of discharge. Then a telephone follow-up will be conducted at 1st week, 2nd week, and 6th month after discharge. The clinical efficacy and safety of WMT in COVD-19 patients suspected of having GMD and the effects of WMT on the organ function, homeostasis, inflammatory response, intestinal mucosal barrier function, and immunity of the patients will be evaluated.

resultsBy following the proposed protocol, WMT is expected to be efficacious and safe for the treatment of COVID-19 patients suspected of having GMD, and the therapeutic effect is expected to be associated with improvement of the intestinal mucosal barrier function, inflammatory response, and immunity.

conclusionThe findings from this study may offer a new approach for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 patients suspected of having GMD.

Indexed as

COVID-19DysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansLiving DonorsMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCOVID-19dysbiosisgut microbiotamicrobiomeSARS-Cov-2 viruswashed microbiota transplantation

Identifiers

PMID34846698
PMCPMC8630278
OpenAlexW3217070349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.