ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2022
The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning from mistakes: Objective and subjective error magnitudes predict the testing effect.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Judgments of learning distinguish humans from large language models in predicting memory.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Role of Creative Mindsets in the Relationship Between Metacognitive Experience and Divergent Thinking: A Metacognitive Perspective.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- How the innovative advertising language style for nutrition products affects consumers' purchase intentions.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The perceived importance of words in large font guides learning and selective memory.Memory & cognition · 2024Article
- Elucidating the underlying components of metacognitive systematic bias in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Responsible attention: the effect of divided attention on metacognition and responsible remembering.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Framing effects in value-directed remembering.Memory & cognition · 2022Article
- Can visual language convey tactile experience? A study of the tactile compensation effect of visual language for online products.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Age-Related Differences in Framing Selective Memory in Terms of Gains and Losses.Experimental aging researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research has indicated that perceptual processing fluency significantly affects metacognitive predictions of performance but not learning outcomes. In the present study, we examined the differential impact of perceptual processing fluency and an item's value on metacognition and recall. We presented participants with words visually and audibly, with each word paired with a point value counting towards participants' scores if recalled. The words were either highly perceptually fluent (large font, loud volume) or less perceptually fluent (small font, low volume). Results revealed that both metacognitive monitoring (JOLs) and recall were sensitive to perceptual processing fluency as well as value, but the magnitude of the effect of value was significantly greater than that of font size. Specifically, high-value words were better remembered than low-value words, regardless of fluency, and participants' judgments mapped onto their selectivity for valuable information. Thus, the current study revealed the differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on metacognitive monitoring and later remembering such that the cues that can influence monitoring in certain encoding conditions become less impactful when pitted against other intrinsic cues in different encoding conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34846689What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.