Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34846553›Full record

ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2022

[Access to health care throughout the country].

A Kis, J Augustin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Skin & Digital-the 2022 startups.Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A KisInstitut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (IVDP), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland. a.kis@uke.de.
J AugustinInstitut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (IVDP), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The legal basis for describing the regional care situation is based on the adjusted supply rate of the 'demand planning guideline'. However, it provides only limited information about the accessibility of medical care which is crucial for the reality of patients' lives. The aim of this review is to present geographic approaches that spatially measure access to dermatological care in its physical and digital dimension. Here, on the one hand, the classical geographic parameter 'accessibility' is addressed, and on the other hand, data from the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI) on broadband coverage are presented as access parameters of teledermatological applications. In addition to the methodological approach, limitations and potentials in the interpretation of the results, minimum standards are also considered. The access parameters presented here make it possible to investigate spatial disparities and to present them clearly via cartographic representations. While the example of accessibility with a car shows almost area-wide access to the nearest dermatology practice (≤ 30 min), investigations on public transport accessibility reveal rather heterogeneous accessibility. Particularly in the identification of 'dual care gaps', sub-areas with poor physical and digital accessibility, these approaches could support and advance the application of alternative care models. However, the approaches presented here focus on potential accessibility. Further dimensions on actual physician utilisation or availability-also with regard to minimum standards-should be the subject of future research.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPhysiciansHumansAccessAccessibilityBroadband coverageRegional health careTeledermatology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.