Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34846088›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2022

Intention to adhere to test, trace, and isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses study).

Louise E Smith, Henry W W Potts, Richard Amlȏt, Nicola T Fear, Susan Michie, G James Rubin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Louise E SmithInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-2564
Henry W W PottsInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6200-8804
Richard AmlȏtNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3481-6588
Nicola T FearInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5792-2925
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0063-6378
G James RubinInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4440-0570
King's College London · GBHealth Data Research UK · GBHealth Protection Scotland · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) To investigate factors associated with intention to self-isolate, request a test, and share details of close contacts when required. (2) To determine whether associations were stronger during periods when less stringent national COVID-19 restrictions were in place.

designSeries of cross-sectional nationally representative surveys. We selected survey waves where different national restrictions were in place in England (first lockdown, summer release, second lockdown, third lockdown).

methodsWe investigated whether psychological factors and increased out-of-home activity in the last week were associated with intention to self-isolate and request a test if you were to develop COVID-19 symptoms, and intention to share details of contacts if you were to test positive. We also investigated whether the strength of associations differed by timepoint in the pandemic.

resultsIntention to self-isolate, request a test and share details of contacts were associated with greater perceived risk of COVID-19 to people in the United Kingdom, knowing that COVID-19 transmission can be asymptomatic, and agreeing that personal behaviour has an impact on COVID-19 transmission. There were few differences in strength of associations by timepoint suggesting these effects are broadly stable over time.

conclusionsPsychological factors were associated with intention to adhere to key components of the contact tracing system; there was no evidence for an association with increased out-of-home activity. Messages that increase knowledge that COVID-19 can be transmitted even if someone does not have symptoms and that an individual's actions can contribute to the spread of the virus may promote engagement with the test, trace, and isolate system.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntentionSARS-CoV-2behaviourcontact tracingCOVID-19predictorspsychological factors

Identifiers

PMID34846088
PMCPMC9542361
OpenAlexW3217205450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.