Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845987›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Control of parallel hippocampal output pathways by amygdalar long-range inhibition.

Rawan AlSubaie, Ryan Ws Wee, Anne Ritoux, Karyna Mishchanchuk, Jessica Passlack, Daniel Regester, Andrew F MacAskill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Proximity in mice induced by an auditory-conditioned stimulus.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Affiliation in mice induced by an auditory-conditioned stimulus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Anxiety and Beyond: Diversity in Ventral Hippocampus Circuits and Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Fear Synchrony of Mouse Dyads: Interaction of Sex Composition and Stress.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rawan AlSubaieDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0721-4744
Ryan Ws WeeDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0273-5521
Anne RitouxDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5760-6172
Karyna MishchanchukDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0996-790X
Jessica PasslackDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-3980
Daniel RegesterDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5372-7479
Andrew F MacAskillDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0196-3779

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 109360/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 215165/Z/18/ZWellcome Trust 222292/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Projections from the basal amygdala (BA) to the ventral hippocampus (vH) are proposed to provide information about the rewarding or threatening nature of learned associations to support appropriate goal-directed and anxiety-like behaviour. Such behaviour occurs via the differential activity of multiple, parallel populations of pyramidal neurons in vH that project to distinct downstream targets, but the nature of BA input and how it connects with these populations is unclear. Using channelrhodopsin-2-assisted circuit mapping in mice, we show that BA input to vH consists of both excitatory and inhibitory projections. Excitatory input specifically targets BA- and nucleus accumbens-projecting vH neurons and avoids prefrontal cortex-projecting vH neurons, while inhibitory input preferentially targets BA-projecting neurons. Through this specific connectivity, BA inhibitory projections gate place-value associations by controlling the activity of nucleus accumbens-projecting vH neurons. Our results define a parallel excitatory and inhibitory projection from BA to vH that can support goal-directed behaviour.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsHippocampusLearningMiceNeural PathwaysPrefrontal CortexPyramidal CellsRewardamygdalahippocampusinhibitionmouseneurosciencenucleus accumbensprefrontal cortexreward

Identifiers

PMID34845987
PMCPMC8654375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.