Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845621›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Predicting and Simulating Mutational Effects on Protein Folding Kinetics.

Athi N Naganathan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Athi N NaganathanDepartment of Biotechnology, Bhupat & Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India. athi@iitm.ac.in.
Indian Institute of Technology Madras · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutational perturbations of protein structures, i.e., phi-value analysis, are commonly employed to probe the extent of involvement of a particular residue in the rate-determining step(s) of folding. This generally involves the measurement of folding thermodynamic parameters and kinetic rate constants for the wild-type and mutant proteins. While computational approaches have been reasonably successful in understanding and predicting the effect of mutations on folding thermodynamics, it has been challenging to explore the same on kinetics due to confounding structural, energetic, and dynamic factors. Accordingly, the frequent observation of fractional phi-values (mean of ~0.3) has resisted a precise and consistent interpretation. Here, we describe how to construct, parameterize, and employ a simple one-dimensional free energy surface model that is grounded in the basic tenets of the energy landscape theory to predict and simulate the effect of mutations on folding kinetics. As a proof of principle, we simulate one-dimensional free energy profiles of 806 mutations from 24 different proteins employing just the experimental destabilization as input, reproduce the relative unfolding activation free energies with a correlation of 0.91, and show that the mean phi-value of 0.3 essentially corresponds to the extent of stabilization energy gained at the barrier top while folding.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingKineticsMutationProteinsThermodynamicsProteinsConformational entropyDiffusive kineticsMicrostatesStabilization energyStatistical mechanicsTransition state ensemble

Identifiers

PMID34845621
OpenAlexW3215170261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.