ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
Deep learning for abdominal adipose tissue segmentation with few labelled samples.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining and Addressing Research Priorities in Cancer Cachexia through Transdisciplinary Collaboration.Cancers · 2024Review
- Automated detection of otosclerosis with interpretable deep learning using temporal bone computed tomography images.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Development of Multiscale 3D Residual U-Net to Segment Edematous Adipose Tissue by Leveraging Annotations from Non-Edematous Adipose Tissue.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFully automated abdominal adipose tissue segmentation from computed tomography (CT) scans plays an important role in biomedical diagnoses and prognoses. However, to identify and segment subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in the abdominal region, the traditional routine process used in clinical practise is unattractive, expensive, time-consuming and leads to false segmentation. To address this challenge, this paper introduces and develops an effective global-anatomy-level convolutional neural network (ConvNet) automated segmentation of abdominal adipose tissue from CT scans termed EFNet to accommodate multistage semantic segmentation and high similarity intensity characteristics of the two classes (VAT and SAT) in the abdominal region.
methodsEFNet consists of three pathways: (1) The first pathway is the max unpooling operator, which was used to reduce computational consumption. (2) The second pathway is concatenation, which was applied to recover the shape segmentation results. (3) The third pathway is anatomy pyramid pooling, which was adopted to obtain fine-grained features. The usable anatomical information was encoded in the output of EFNet and allowed for the control of the density of the fine-grained features.
resultsWe formulated an end-to-end manner for the learning process of EFNet, where the representation features can be jointly learned through a mixed feature fusion layer. We immensely evaluated our model on different datasets and compared it to existing deep learning networks. Our proposed model called EFNet outperformed other state-of-the-art models on the segmentation results and demonstrated tremendous performances for abdominal adipose tissue segmentation.
conclusionEFNet is extremely fast with remarkable performance for fully automated segmentation of the VAT and SAT in abdominal adipose tissue from CT scans. The proposed method demonstrates a strength ability for automated detection and segmentation of abdominal adipose tissue in clinical practise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34845590What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.