Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845554›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Kesha Oza, Tejasvi Peesay, Benjamin Greenspun, John E Carroll, Shervin Shafa, Jay C Zeck, Nadim G Haddad, Marc Margolis, Puja Gaur Khaitan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kesha OzaDepartment of General Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Tejasvi PeesayDepartment of General Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Benjamin GreenspunDepartment of General Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
John E CarrollDepartment of Gastroenterology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Shervin ShafaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Jay C ZeckDepartment of Pathology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Nadim G HaddadDepartment of Gastroenterology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Marc MargolisDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW (G253), Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
Puja Gaur KhaitanDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW (G253), Washington, DC, 20010, USA. Puja.G.Khaitan@medstar.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8654-062X
Georgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith growing application of endoscopic therapy for early-stage esophageal cancer, we sought to review our experience of endoscopic mucosal resections (EMRs). The aim of our study was to understand the natural course of these patients, especially with positive margins.

methodsA prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing endoscopic therapies at Georgetown University Hospital for esophageal cancer was used for the analysis between 2010 and 2020.

resultsOf 80 patients in the EMR database, 35 were performed as index cases for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Majority (74.3%) had a pre-treatment ultrasound confirming absence of regional adenopathy. There were no post-EMR bleeding or perforation events requiring re-intervention. Complete R0 resection was achieved in 22/35 (62.9%) after initial EMR. Thirteen patients had positive margins. Of these 13 patients, only 7 patients underwent repeat endoscopic resection, 2 underwent subsequent esophagectomy, 2 received definitive radiation given poor surgical candidacy, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Overall and 5-year survival of all patients undergoing EMR was 67.9 months and 85%, respectively. Subset analysis of the 13 patients with R1 resection demonstrated an overall survival of 49.2 months and 60% 5-year survival vs overall survival of 78.9 months and 93% 5-year survival for R0 resection. At a median follow-up of 60.5 months, cancer recurrence occurred in 3 patients. All of them were successfully managed with repeat EMR.

conclusionsEndoscopic resections represent a safe and effective treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer. Patients with high-risk features should be counseled to undergo an esophagectomy if they are operable candidates.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEarly-stage esophageal cancerEndoscopic resectionPositive margins

Identifiers

PMID34845554
OpenAlexW3216307490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.