Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845527›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

Neonatal pneumothoraces with atypical location: the role of lung ultrasound.

Rebeca Gregorio-Hernández, Alba Pérez-Pérez, Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena, María Arriaga-Redondo, Cristina Ramos-Navarro, Manuel Sánchez-Luna

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebeca Gregorio-HernándezNeonatology Department, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. rebeca.gregorio@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7484-0593
Alba Pérez-PérezNeonatology Department, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Almudena Alonso-OjembarrenaNeonatology Department, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.
María Arriaga-RedondoNeonatology Department, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Ramos-NavarroNeonatology Department, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Sánchez-LunaNeonatology Department, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Puerta del Mar · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal pneumothorax (NP) is a potentially life-threatening condition. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has shown higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis compared to x-rays, but evidence regarding its usefulness in complex NP is lacking. We report four neonates suffering from cardiac or esophageal malformations who developed lateral and/or posterior pneumothoraces, in which LUS helped, making NP diagnosis and management easier and faster.

conclusionLUS is an easy-to-use, fast, simple, and accurate tool when evaluating newborns with NP, also in atypical positions such as in surgical patients. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Lung ultrasound (LUS) has higher sensitivity and specificity than x-rays in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in neonatal patients. WHAT IS NEW: • This is the first report about neonatal pneumothorax in non-conventional areas (lateral/posterior) diagnosed by lung ultrasound and how obtaining this information is critical in order to optimize management.

Indexed as

PneumothoraxHumansInfant, NewbornLungRadiographySensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyCase reportLung ultrasoundNeonatesPneumothoraxUltrasound-guided procedure

Identifiers

PMID34845527
OpenAlexW3216786755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.