Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845497›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2021

Naive poison frog tadpoles use bi-modal cues to avoid insect predators but not heterospecific predatory tadpoles.

Birgit Szabo, Rosanna Mangione, Matthias Rath, Andrius Pašukonis, Stephan A Reber, Jinook Oh, Max Ringler, Eva Ringler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multimodal Cues Do Not Improve Predator Recognition in Green Toad Tadpoles.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Predation risk shapes among- and within-individual variation in behavior in poison frog tadpoles.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Birgit SzaboDivision of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3226-8621
Rosanna MangioneDivision of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3505-1089
Matthias RathDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2811-1178
Andrius PašukonisDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Stephan A ReberDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8015-2538
Jinook OhDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7425-2372
Max RinglerDivision of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4530-4919
Eva RinglerDivision of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3273-6568
University of Bern · CHUniversity of Vienna · ATCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24788Austrian Science Fund FWF P24788Austrian Science Fund FWF P 31518Austrian Science Fund FWF P 33728Austrian Science Fund FWF T 699Marie Curie 835530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For animals to survive until reproduction, it is crucial that juveniles successfully detect potential predators and respond with appropriate behavior. The recognition of cues originating from predators can be innate or learned. Cues of various modalities might be used alone or in multi-modal combinations to detect and distinguish predators but studies investigating multi-modal integration in predator avoidance are scarce. Here, we used wild, naive tadpoles of the Neotropical poison frog Allobates femoralis ( Boulenger, 1884) to test their reaction to cues with two modalities from two different sympatrically occurring potential predators: heterospecific predatory Dendrobates tinctorius tadpoles and dragonfly larvae. We presented A. femoralis tadpoles with olfactory or visual cues, or a combination of the two, and compared their reaction to a water control in a between-individual design. In our trials, A. femoralis tadpoles reacted to multi-modal stimuli (a combination of visual and chemical information) originating from dragonfly larvae with avoidance but showed no reaction to uni-modal cues or cues from heterospecific tadpoles. In addition, visual cues from conspecifics increased swimming activity while cues from predators had no effect on tadpole activity. Our results show that A. femoralis tadpoles can innately recognize some predators and probably need both visual and chemical information to effectively avoid them. This is the first study looking at anti-predator behavior in poison frog tadpoles. We discuss how parental care might influence the expression of predator avoidance responses in tadpoles.

Indexed as

OdonataPoisonsAnimalsCuesLarvaPredatory BehaviorRanidaePoisonsAnti-predator behaviorAnuranCross-modal integrationCue recognitionInnate predator detection

Identifiers

PMID34845497
PMCPMC8729909
OpenAlexW3215329676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.