Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845437›Full record

Observational studyBioMed research international2021

The Teledentistry, Impact, Current Trends, and Application in Dentistry: A Global Study.

Afsheen Maqsood, Muhammad Shahrukh Khan Sadiq, Daud Mirza, Naseer Ahmed, Abhishek Lal, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Mohamad Syahrizal Bin Halim

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Afsheen MaqsoodDepartment of Oral Pathology, Bahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi 75530, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8395-4093
Muhammad Shahrukh Khan SadiqDepartment of Oral Pathology, Bahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi 75530, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-8490
Daud MirzaDepartment of Oral Pathology, Bahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi 75530, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-0834
Naseer AhmedProsthodontics Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0960-1123
Abhishek LalResearch Intern, Department of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi 75500, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0018-7069
Mohammad Khursheed AlamDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Al Jouf, 72345, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-1752
Mohamad Syahrizal Bin HalimConservative Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-8070
Bahria University · PKKarachi Medical and Dental College · PKHospital Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYJouf University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study was aimed at assessing the impact of teledentistry, its application, and trends in uplifting dental practice and clinical care around the world.

resultsA total of 506 dental professionals participated in the study with the response rate of 89.39%. More than half of the participants (50-75%) endorsed that teledentistry is a useful tool for improving clinical practice as well as patient care. Two-thirds of the participants (69.96%) considered that teledentistry would reduce cost for the dental practices. On the other hand, about 50-70% of dental professionals expressed their concerns regarding the security of the data and consent of patients. The most preferred communication tool for teledentistry was reported to be videoconference followed by phone. The majority of participants recommended the use of teledentistry in the specialty of oral medicine, operative dentistry, and periodontics. There was a significant difference between the age, experience of dentists, and their qualifications with domains of teledentistry.

conclusionsThe overall impact of dental professionals towards teledentistry was positive with adequate willingness to incorporate this modality in their clinical practice. However, the perceived concerns pertaining to teledentistry are significant impediments towards its integration within the oral health system. An in-depth study of its business model and cost-benefit needs of time, especially in the context of developing countries, in order to avail the optimum benefits of teledentistry.

Indexed as

AdultAsiaAttitude of Health PersonnelDentistryDentistsEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34845437
PMCPMC8627361
OpenAlexW3209079172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.