Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845423›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2021

Impact of Different Oxygen Supply Methods on the Healing of Corneal Epithelial Wound and the Level of Acetylcholine.

Shanshan Li, Gang Ding, Yuqin Sun, Chenming Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Optical microsensing reveals spatiotemporal oxygen dynamics in cornea wounds that affect healing via reactive oxygen species.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shanshan LiJinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-1210
Gang DingJinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3616-7470
Yuqin SunJinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2130-2978
Chenming ZhangJinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5357-5711
Fourth People’s Hospital of Jinan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the impact of different oxygen supply methods on corneal epithelial wound healing and acetylcholine level during wound healing.

methodsWe randomly divided 75 rabbits into three groups: A, B, and C, with 25 rabbits in each group. The central corneal epithelium was removed from all eyes of the rabbits using a 5 mm trephine. Group A rabbits were given low flow oxygen (3 L/min; concentration: 33%) for 2 h per day through goggles. Group B rabbits were given low flow oxygen (3 L/min; concentration: 33%) for 2 h per day via oxygen masks for inhalation. Group C rabbits healed naturally. The area of healed corneal epithelium and acetylcholine content in corneal epithelium were determined at 12 h, 24 h, and 36 h after injury.

resultsAt 12 h, 24 h, and 36 h after injury, the healing area of corneal epithelium in the three groups was in the order group A > group B > group C (

conclusionIncreasing oxygen concentration through inhalation or via goggles can promote corneal epithelial wound healing, but increasing local oxygen concentration of the eye showed a better effect. Acetylcholine may play an important role in the early process of corneal epithelial wound healing.

Identifiers

PMID34845423
PMCPMC8627331
OpenAlexW3216733965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.