Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845227›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Compressive stress-mediated p38 activation required for ERα + phenotype in breast cancer.

Pauliina M Munne, Lahja Martikainen, Iiris Räty, Kia Bertula, Nonappa, Janika Ruuska, Hanna Ala-Hongisto, Aino Peura, Babette Hollmann, Lilya Euro and 24 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Embryonic scaling: morphogen gradients, size sensing, and scaler genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A novel preclinical model of the normal human breast.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A Decision Tree to Guide Human and Mouse Mammary Organoid Model Selection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pauliina M MunneFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9720-9964
Lahja Martikainen *Department of Applied Physics, Molecular Materials Group, Aalto University School of Science, PO Box, 15100, FI-00076, Espoo, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7092-8467
Iiris Räty *Finnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5241-1368
Kia BertulaDepartment of Applied Physics, Molecular Materials Group, Aalto University School of Science, PO Box, 15100, FI-00076, Espoo, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7134-3591
NonappaDepartment of Applied Physics, Molecular Materials Group, Aalto University School of Science, PO Box, 15100, FI-00076, Espoo, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6804-4128
Janika RuuskaFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3978-2033
Hanna Ala-HongistoFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5850-1623
Aino PeuraFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8958-940X
Babette HollmannFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lilya EuroResearch Program of Stem Cells and Metabolism, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-3886
Kerim YavuzApplied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Enhancer Biology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4980-8804
Linda PatrikainenFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Maria SalmelaFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Juho PokkiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-7675
Mikko KiventoApplied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, Oncogenomics Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-0652
Juho VäänänenApplied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, Oncogenomics Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-1411
Tomi SuomiTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3639-979X
Liina NevalaitaFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-1873
Minna MutkaDepartment of Pathology, HUSLAB and Haartman Institute, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8380-7293
Panu KovanenDepartment of Pathology, HUSLAB and Haartman Institute, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8218-2271
Marjut LeideniusBreast Surgery Unit, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Tuomo MeretojaBreast Surgery Unit, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Katja HukkinenDepartment of Mammography, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Outi MonniApplied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, Oncogenomics Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2319-8799
Jeroen PouwelsFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Biswajyoti SahuApplied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Enhancer Biology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-5440
Johanna MattsonDepartment of Oncology, University of Helsinki & Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9719-9110
Heikki JoensuuDepartment of Oncology, University of Helsinki & Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-2507
Päivi HeikkiläDepartment of Pathology, HUSLAB and Haartman Institute, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Laura L EloTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5648-4532
Ciara MetcalfeGenentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Melissa R JunttilaGenentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Olli IkkalaDepartment of Applied Physics, Molecular Materials Group, Aalto University School of Science, PO Box, 15100, FI-00076, Espoo, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-1889
Juha KlefströmFinnish Cancer Institute, FICAN South Helsinki University Hospital & Translational Cancer Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki. Cancer Cell Circuitry Laboratory, PO Box 63 Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Juha.Klefstrom@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-8431
University of Helsinki · FIAalto University · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIÅbo Akademi University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is now globally the most frequent cancer and leading cause of women's death. Two thirds of breast cancers express the luminal estrogen receptor-positive (ERα + ) phenotype that is initially responsive to antihormonal therapies, but drug resistance emerges. A major barrier to the understanding of the ERα-pathway biology and therapeutic discoveries is the restricted repertoire of luminal ERα + breast cancer models. The ERα + phenotype is not stable in cultured cells for reasons not fully understood. We examine 400 patient-derived breast epithelial and breast cancer explant cultures (PDECs) grown in various three-dimensional matrix scaffolds, finding that ERα is primarily regulated by the matrix stiffness. Matrix stiffness upregulates the ERα signaling via stress-mediated p38 activation and H3K27me3-mediated epigenetic regulation. The finding that the matrix stiffness is a central cue to the ERα phenotype reveals a mechanobiological component in breast tissue hormonal signaling and enables the development of novel therapeutic interventions. Subject terms: ER-positive (ER + ), breast cancer, ex vivo model, preclinical model, PDEC, stiffness, p38 SAPK.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCell Line, TumorCinnamatesCollagenDrug CombinationsEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleFulvestrantGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistonesHumans3-(4-(2-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-1-(1H-indazol-5-yl)but-1-en-1-yl)phenyl)acrylic acidCinnamatesCollagenDrug CombinationsEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinESR1 protein, humanEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaEZH2 protein, humanFulvestrantHistonesIndazolesLamininmatrigelp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProteoglycansTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID34845227
PMCPMC8630031
OpenAlexW3214787171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.