ArticleNature communications2021
Location-specific co-benefits of carbon emissions reduction from coal-fired power plants in China.
Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large emission mitigation potential from sequencing fossil fuel extraction infrastructure retirement in China.iScience · 2026Article
- Evaluating the economic and social impact of coal mine phaseout in China.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- High-power hybrid commutated converter for carbon-neutral power transmission.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Unraveling land-use carbon-pollution co-evolution: A dynamic coordination framework with causal pathways and spatial zoning.iScience · 2026Article
- The social impacts on China's vulnerable cities in the transition away from coal power.iScience · 2025Article
- Article
- Maximizing the environmental benefits of gas power development in China: A multidisciplinary modeling approach.iScience · 2024Article
- Substantial differences in source contributions to carbon emissions and health damage necessitate balanced synergistic control plans in China.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness uncertainty may bias the decision of coal power transitions in China.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Overlooked COEnvironmental science and ecotechnology · 2024Article
- Can multi-agent cooperation promote the ecological value realization of blue carbon in marine ranching?Heliyon · 2023Article
- Article
- A Source Apportionment and Emission Scenario Assessment of PMGeoHealth · 2023Article
- Economics of planning electricity transmission considering environmental and health externalities.iScience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate policies that achieve air quality co-benefits can better align developing countries' national interests with global climate mitigation. Since the effects of air pollutants are highly dependent on source locations, spatially nuanced policies are crucial to maximizing the achievement of co-benefits. Using the coal power industry as a case study, this study presents an interdisciplinary approach to assessing facility level co-benefits at every specific source location in China. We find that co-benefits range from US$51-$278 per ton CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.