Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845079›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Pylorus resection versus pylorus preservation in pancreatoduodenectomy (PyloResPres): study protocol and statistical analysis plan for a German multicentre, single-blind, surgical, registry-based randomised controlled trial.

Bernhard W Renz, Christine Adrion, Carsten Klinger, Matthias Ilmer, Jan G D'Haese, Heinz-J Buhr, Ulrich Mansmann, Jens Werner, PyloResPres Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bernhard W Renz *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9574-8051
Christine Adrion *Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2408-2533
Carsten KlingerGerman Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany.
Matthias IlmerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9597-1368
Jan G D'HaeseDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-8753
Heinz-J BuhrGerman Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany.
Ulrich MansmannInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany mansmann@ibe.med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9955-8906
Jens Werner
PyloResPres Study Group
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEGerman Society of Surgery · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPartial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the treatment of choice for various benign and malignant tumours of the pancreatic head or the periampullary region. For reconstruction of the gastrointestinal passage, two stomach-preserving PD variants exist: pylorus preservation PD (ppPD) or pylorus resection PD (prPD) with preservation of the stomach. In pancreatic surgery, delayed gastric emptying (DGE) remains a serious complication after PD with an incidence varying between 4.5% and 45%, potentially delaying hospital discharge or further treatment, for example, adjuvant chemotherapy. Evidence is lacking to assess, which variant of PD entails fewer postoperative DGE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol of a large-scale, multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, registry-based randomised controlled trial (rRCT) using a two-stage group-sequential design is presented. This patient-blind rRCT aims to demonstrate the superiority of prPD over ppPD with respect to the overall incidence of DGE within 30 days after index surgery in a German real-world setting. A total of 984 adults undergoing elective PD for any indication will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Patients will be recruited at about 30 hospitals being members of the StuDoQ|Pancreas registry established by the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery. The postoperative follow-up for each patient will be 30 days. The primary analysis will follow an intention-to-treat approach and applies a binary logistic random intercepts model. Secondary perioperative outcomes include overall severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification), blood loss, 30-day all-cause mortality, postoperative hospital stay and operation time. Complication rates and adverse events will be closely monitored. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the leading ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich (reference number 19-221). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences. Study findings will also be disseminated via the website (http://www.dgav.de/studoq/pylorespres/). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS-ID: DRKS00018842.

Indexed as

PancreaticoduodenectomyPylorusEquivalence Trials as TopicGastric EmptyingHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegistriesSingle-Blind Methodadult surgeryclinical trialspancreatic diseasepancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34845079
PMCPMC8733944
OpenAlexW3216902801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.