Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845077›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Live birth after additional tubal flushing with oil-based contrast versus no additional flushing: a randomised, multicentre, parallel-group pragmatic trial in infertile women with at least one patent tube at hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HYFOIL study).

Diane De Neubourg, Lara Janssens, Iris Verhaegen, Elke Smits, Ben W Mol, Ella Roelant

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04379973 (Live Birth After Additional Tubal Flushing With Oil-based Contrast Versus no Additional Flushing), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04379973 phase4active not recruitingnot on this map

Live Birth After Additional Tubal Flushing With Oil-based Contrast Versus no Additional Flushing: a Randomised, Multicentre, Parallel Group Pragmatic Trial in Infertile Women With at Least One Patent Tube at Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography

TypeinterventionalSponsorDafne BalemansRan2021 to 2027Enrolled736ConditionsInfertility, FemaleArmsLipiodol Ultra Fluide®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic workup for a couple with unexplained infertility - VVOG guidance.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diane De NeubourgCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium diane.deneubourg@uza.be.ORCID 0000-0002-9159-5083
Lara JanssensCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Iris VerhaegenClinical Trial Centre, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Elke SmitsClinical Trial Centre, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Ben W MolOB/GYN, School of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton VIC, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8337-550X
Ella RoelantClinical Trial Centre, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Antwerp University Hospital · BEMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTubal patency testing is an essential part in the fertility workup of many subfertile women. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) has long been the test of choice in many clinics. There is evidence from a large randomised multicentre trial and from a recent meta-analysis that women who had HSG using oil soluble contrast medium (OSCM) had higher rates of ongoing pregnancy compared with women who underwent this procedure using water contrast. However, the field is moving away from HSG and nowadays hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (Hyfosy) using ultrasound guidance is considered as the first line office tubal patency test. Therefore, a large multicentre randomised clinical trial (RCT) will be initiated to evaluate if flushing the fallopian tubes with OSCM after a normal Hyfosy showing at least one patent fallopian tube will increase the live birth rate as compared with no flushing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan a multicentre two arm, 1:1 randomised, open-label pragmatic comparative trial in 12 Belgian centres. After informed consent, we will randomise infertile women between 18 and 40 years of age, undergoing Hyfosy as part of the fertility workup to Hyfosy with additional tubal flushing with OSCM versus Hyfosy without additional flushing. Infertility is defined as lack of conception despite 12 months of unprotected intercourse, or three cycles of donor insemination without pregnancy or three ovulatory ovulation induction cycles without pregnancy, all three in combination with at least one patent tube on Hyfosy. Primary endpoint will be live birth with conception within 6 months after randomisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval on 11 May 2021 by the Ethics Committee from ZNA Hospital Antwerp who was the central Ethics Committee for the Clinical Trial Regulation Pilot (Pilot 412) in the 12 centres. The findings from this RCT will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT number: 2020-002135-30 and NCT04379973.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleLive BirthContrast MediaFallopian TubesFemaleHumansHysterosalpingographyMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUltrasonographyContrast Mediahealth economicsreproductive medicinesubfertility

Identifiers

PMID34845077
PMCPMC8634016
OpenAlexW3216255691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.