Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34845013›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Transformational machine learning: Learning how to learn from many related scientific problems.

Ivan Olier, Oghenejokpeme I Orhobor, Tirtharaj Dash, Andy M Davis, Larisa N Soldatova, Joaquin Vanschoren, Ross D King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ivan OlierSchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5679-7501
Oghenejokpeme I OrhoborDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0AS, United Kingdom.
Tirtharaj DashAnuradha and Prashanth Palakurthi Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research, Department of Computer Science & Information Systems, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Goa 403726, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5965-8286
Andy M DavisDiscovery Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge CB4 0WG, United Kingdom.
Larisa N SoldatovaDepartment of Computing, Goldsmiths, University of London, London SE14 6NW, United Kingdom.
Joaquin VanschorenDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7044-9805
Ross D KingDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0AS, United Kingdom; rk663@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7208-4387

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E018025/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F008228/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost all machine learning (ML) is based on representing examples using intrinsic features. When there are multiple related ML problems (tasks), it is possible to transform these features into extrinsic features by first training ML models on other tasks and letting them each make predictions for each example of the new task, yielding a novel representation. We call this transformational ML (TML). TML is very closely related to, and synergistic with, transfer learning, multitask learning, and stacking. TML is applicable to improving any nonlinear ML method. We tested TML using the most important classes of nonlinear ML: random forests, gradient boosting machines, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, and neural networks. To ensure the generality and robustness of the evaluation, we utilized thousands of ML problems from three scientific domains: drug design, predicting gene expression, and ML algorithm selection. We found that TML significantly improved the predictive performance of all the ML methods in all the domains (4 to 50% average improvements) and that TML features generally outperformed intrinsic features. Use of TML also enhances scientific understanding through explainable ML. In drug design, we found that TML provided insight into drug target specificity, the relationships between drugs, and the relationships between target proteins. TML leads to an ecosystem-based approach to ML, where new tasks, examples, predictions, and so on synergistically interact to improve performance. To contribute to this ecosystem, all our data, code, and our ∼50,000 ML models have been fully annotated with metadata, linked, and openly published using Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability principles (∼100 Gbytes).

Indexed as

AIdrug designmultitask learningstackingtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID34845013
PMCPMC8670494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.