Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34844699›Full record

ArticleTrends in neuroscience and education2021

Primary school mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic: No evidence of learning gaps in adaptive practicing results.

Martijn Meeter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in neuroscience and education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martijn MeeterLEARN! Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, V.d. Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: m.meeter@vu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic induced many governments to close schools for months. Evidence so far suggests that learning has suffered as a result. Here, it is investigated whether forms of computer-assisted learning mitigated the decrements in learning observed during the lockdown.

methodPerformance of 53,656 primary school students who used adaptive practicing software for mathematics was compared to performance of similar students in the preceding year.

resultsDuring the lockdown progress was faster than it had been the year before, contradicting results reported so far. These enhanced gains were correlated with increased use, and remained after the lockdown ended. This was the case for all grades but more so for lower grades and for weak students, but less so for students in schools with disadvantaged populations.

conclusionsThese results suggest that adaptive practicing software may mitigate, or even reverse, the negative effects of school closures on mathematics learning.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansMathematicsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SchoolsAdaptive practiceCOVID-19MathematicsPrimary schoolSchool closures

Identifiers

PMID34844699
PMCPMC8487463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.