Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34844697›Full record

ArticleTrends in neuroscience and education2021

Evaluating students' engagement with an online learning environment during and after COVID-19 related school closures: A survival analysis approach.

Markus Wolfgang Hermann Spitzer, Raphael Gutsfeld, Maria Wirzberger, Korbinian Moeller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in neuroscience and education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Markus Wolfgang Hermann SpitzerInstitute of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg 79085, Germany. Electronic address: markus.spitzer@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de.
Raphael GutsfeldLudwig-Maximilian-Universität München, München 80802, Germany.
Maria WirzbergerUniversity of Stuttgart, Stuttgart 70174, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tuebingen, Germany; LEAD Graduate School and Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Germany.
Korbinian MoellerLEAD Graduate School and Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Germany; Centre for Mathematical Cognition, School of Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom; Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany; Individual Development and Adaptive Education for Children at Risk Center, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the COVID-19 pandemic schools all over the world were closed and thereby students had to be instructed from distance. Consequently, the use of online learning environments for online distance learning increased massively. However, the perseverance of using online learning environments during and after school closures remains to be investigated.

methodWe examined German students' (n ≈ 300,000 students; ≈ 18 million computed problem sets) engagement in an online learning environment for mathematics by means of survival analysis.

resultsWe observed that the total number of students who registered increased considerably during and after school closures compared to the previous three years. Importantly, however, the proportion of students engaged also decreased more rapidly over time.

conclusionThe application of survival analysis provided valuable insights into students' engagement in online learning - or conversely students' increased dropout rates - over time. Its application to educational settings allows to address a broader range of questions on students' engagement in online learning environments in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SchoolsStudentsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34844697
PMCPMC8599139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.