Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34844175›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Research on the cutoff tumor size of omitting radiotherapy for BCSS after breast conserving surgery in women aged 65 years or oder with low-risk invasive breast carcinoma: Results based on the SEER database.

Zejian Yang, Kunlong Li, Pei Qiu, Yifei Ma, Bin Wang, Yu Yan, Du Meng, Chen Feng, Yu Ren, Yijun Li and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zejian YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China; Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, 76 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China.
Kunlong LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China; Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, 76 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China.
Pei QiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China; Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, 76 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yifei MaDepartment of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China; Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, 76 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China.
Bin WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yu YanDepartment of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China.
Du MengDepartment of Radiotherapy, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China.
Chen FengDepartment of Translational Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China; Department of Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial Corps Hospital, Xi'an, 710061, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Yu RenDepartment of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yijun LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China; Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, 76 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China.
Pingping LiDepartment of Translational Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China. Electronic address: 13468845587@139.com.
Can ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Rd., Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China. Electronic address: zhoucanz2005@xjtufh.edu.cn.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CNShaanxi Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is not always necessary in older women staged T1N0M0 with low-risk invasive breast cancer, but few studies have concluded the detailed tumor size as a reference for avoiding radiotherapy. The study was conducted to explore and identify the optimal cutoff tumor size.

methodsThe study population was from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database in 2010-2016. Propensity score matching was used to balance the confounders between groups. Predictors associated with survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier, X-tile, Cox proportional hazards model and competing risk model.

resultsA total of 52049 women and 3846 deaths were included in the cohort with a median follow-up of 34 months. Based on the cutoff value determined by X-tile analysis, the study population were divided into small tumor group (≤14 mm in diameter) and large tumor group (>14 mm in diameter). Small tumors and radiotherapy were correlated with better breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). In subgroup analysis, the absolute benefit of BCSS in 6 years attributed to radiotherapy was only 0.90% (RT vs. non- RT:98.77% vs. 97.87%) for patients with small tumors but up to 3.33% (RT vs. non- RT:97.10% vs. 93.77%) for those with large tumors.

conclusionSmall tumors and adjuvant radiotherapy were associated with improved long-term prognosis, and 14 mm in diameter was the cutoff tumor size of omitting radiotherapy for patients aged 65 or older with T1N0M0 stage, ER+ and HER2-breast carcinoma after BCS.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMastectomy, SegmentalAgedBreastFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSEER ProgramBreast-conserving surgeryPostoperative radiotherapySEERTumor sizeX-tile analysis

Identifiers

PMID34844175
PMCPMC8714502
OpenAlexW3215049135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.