Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843669›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2022

Optimised versus standard dosing of vancomycin in infants with Gram-positive sepsis (NeoVanc): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial.

Louise F Hill, Michelle N Clements, Mark A Turner, Daniele Donà, Irja Lutsar, Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain, Paul T Heath, Emmanuel Roilides, Louise Rawcliffe, Clara Alonso-Diaz and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02790996 (Multi-centre, Randomised, Open Label, Phase IIb Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02790996 phase2terminatednot on this map

Multi-centre, Randomised, Open Label, Phase IIb Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of an Optimised Dosing to a Standard Dosing Regimen of Vancomycin in Neonates and Infants Aged ≤ 90 Days With Late Onset Bacterial Sepsis Known or Suspected to be Caused by Gram-positive Microorganisms

TypeinterventionalSponsorPENTA FoundationRan2017 to 2020Enrolled242ConditionsLate Onset Neonatal SepsisArmsVancomycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. State of Vancomycin Dosing in Neonates: An Overview.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  6. Methicillin-resistantThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Safe and effective use of vancomycin.Australian prescriber · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 6 countries.

Louise F HillInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK. Electronic address: lhill@sgul.ac.uk.
Michelle N ClementsMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Mark A TurnerInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Daniele DonàDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Fondazione Penta, Padua, Italy.
Irja LutsarUniversity of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Evelyne Jacqz-AigrainDepartment of Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
Paul T HeathInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Emmanuel Roilides3rd Department of Pediatrics, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Louise RawcliffeTherakind, London, UK.
Clara Alonso-DiazHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Eugenio BaraldiAzienda Ospedale-Universita' di Padova, Fondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica, Padova, Italy.
Andrea DottaOspedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy.
Mari-Liis IlmojaTallinn Children's Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia.
Ajit MahaveerSt Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Tuuli MetsvahtTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
George MitsiakosPapageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vassiliki PapaevangelouGeneral University Hospital, Chaïdári, Greece.
Kosmas SarafidisHippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
A Sarah WalkerMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Michael SharlandInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
NeoVanc Consortium
St George's, University of London · GBTallinn Health Care College · EEUniversity College London · GBAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITHippocration General Hospital · GRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESPapageorgiou General Hospital · GRPENTA Foundation · ITSt Mary's Hospital · GBTartu University Hospital · EEUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Tartu · EECittà della Speranza Foundation · ITMedical Research Council · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/05Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/09Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVancomycin is the most widely used antibiotic for neonatal Gram-positive sepsis, but clinical outcome data of dosing strategies are scarce. The NeoVanc programme comprised extensive preclinical studies to inform a randomised controlled trial to assess optimised vancomycin dosing. We compared the efficacy of an optimised regimen to a standard regimen in infants with late onset sepsis that was known or suspected to be caused by Gram-positive microorganisms.

methodsNeoVanc was an open-label, multicentre, phase 2b, parallel-group, randomised, non-inferiority trial comparing the efficacy and toxicity of an optimised regimen of vancomycin to a standard regimen in infants aged 90 days or younger. Infants with at least three clinical or laboratory sepsis criteria or confirmed Gram-positive sepsis with at least one clinical or laboratory criterion were enrolled from 22 neonatal intensive care units in Greece, Italy, Estonia, Spain, and the UK. Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the optimised regimen (25 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 15 mg/kg every 12 h or 8 h dependent on postmenstrual age, for 5 ± 1 days) or the standard regimen (no loading dose; 15 mg/kg every 24 h, 12 h, or 8 h dependent on postmenstrual age for 10 ± 2 days). Vancomycin was administered intravenously via 60 min infusion. Group allocation was not masked to local investigators or parents. The primary endpoint was success at the test of cure visit (10 ± 1 days after the end of actual vancomycin therapy) in the per-protocol population, where success was defined as the participant being alive at the test of cure visit, having a successful outcome at the end of actual vancomycin therapy, and not having a clinically or microbiologically significant relapse or new infection requiring antistaphylococcal antibiotics for more than 24 h within 10 days of the end of actual vancomycin therapy. The non-inferiority margin was -10%. Safety was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02790996).

findingsBetween March 3, 2017, and July 29, 2019, 242 infants were randomly assigned to the standard regimen group (n=122) or the optimised regimen group (n=120). Primary outcome data in the per-protocol population were available for 90 infants in the optimised group and 92 in the standard group. 64 (71%) of 90 infants in the optimised group and 73 (79%) of 92 in the standard group had success at test of cure visit; non-inferiority was not confirmed (adjusted risk difference -7% [95% CI -15 to 2]). Incomplete resolution of clinical or laboratory signs after 5 ± 1 days of vancomycin therapy was the main factor contributing to clinical failure in the optimised group. Abnormal hearing test results were recorded in 25 (30%) of 84 infants in the optimised group and 12 (15%) of 79 in the standard group (adjusted risk ratio 1·96 [95% CI 1·07 to 3·59], p=0·030). There were six vancomycin-related adverse events in the optimised group (one serious adverse event) and four in the standard group (two serious adverse events). 11 infants in the intention-to-treat population died (six [6%] of 102 infants in the optimised group and five [5%] of 98 in the standard group).

interpretationIn the largest neonatal vancomycin efficacy trial yet conducted, no clear clinical impact of a shorter duration of treatment with a loading dose was demonstrated. The use of the optimised regimen cannot be recommended because a potential hearing safety signal was identified; long-term follow-up is being done. These results emphasise the importance of robust clinical safety assessments of novel antibiotic dosing regimens in infants.

fundingEU Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEquivalence Trials as TopicIntensive Care Units, NeonatalVancomycinEuropeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfusions, IntravenousSepsisSpainTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID34843669
PMCPMC7614674
OpenAlexW3202775288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.