Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843603›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Object detection for automatic cancer cell counting in zebrafish xenografts.

Carina Albuquerque, Leonardo Vanneschi, Roberto Henriques, Mauro Castelli, Vanda Póvoa, Rita Fior, Nickolas Papanikolaou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CsDETC: detection and counting of small targetFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carina AlbuquerqueNova Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1888-9018
Leonardo VanneschiNova Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Roberto HenriquesNova Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Mauro CastelliNova Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8793-1451
Vanda PóvoaComputational Clinical Imaging Group, Center for the Unknown, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal.
Rita FiorComputational Clinical Imaging Group, Center for the Unknown, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal.
Nickolas PapanikolaouComputational Clinical Imaging Group, Center for the Unknown, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal.
Universidade Nova de Lisboa · PTChampalimaud Foundation · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell counting is a frequent task in medical research studies. However, it is often performed manually; thus, it is time-consuming and prone to human error. Even so, cell counting automation can be challenging to achieve, especially when dealing with crowded scenes and overlapping cells, assuming different shapes and sizes. In this paper, we introduce a deep learning-based cell detection and quantification methodology to automate the cell counting process in the zebrafish xenograft cancer model, an innovative technique for studying tumor biology and for personalizing medicine. First, we implemented a fine-tuned architecture based on the Faster R-CNN using the Inception ResNet V2 feature extractor. Second, we performed several adjustments to optimize the process, paying attention to constraints such as the presence of overlapped cells, the high number of objects to detect, the heterogeneity of the cells' size and shape, and the small size of the data set. This method resulted in a median error of approximately 1% of the total number of cell units. These results demonstrate the potential of our novel approach for quantifying cells in poorly labeled images. Compared to traditional Faster R-CNN, our method improved the average precision from 71% to 85% on the studied data set.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAnimalsCell CountHeterograftsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsNeoplasms, ExperimentalNeoplasm TransplantationZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34843603
PMCPMC8629215
OpenAlexW3216649800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.