Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843541›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Change in treatment burden among people with multimorbidity: Protocol of a follow up survey and development of efficient measurement tools for primary care.

Hilda O Hounkpatin, Paul Roderick, James E Morris, Scott Harris, Forbes Watson, Hajira Dambha-Miller, Helen Roberts, Bronagh Walsh, Dianna Smith, Simon D S Fraser and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A rapid review of interventions to improve medicine self-management for older people living at home.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Review
  3. Change in treatment burden among people with multimorbidity: a follow-up survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hilda O HounkpatinSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1360-1791
Paul RoderickSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
James E MorrisSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Scott HarrisSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Forbes WatsonNHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group, Dorset, United Kingdom.
Hajira Dambha-MillerSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Helen RobertsHuman Development and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Bronagh WalshHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Dianna SmithGeography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Simon D S FraserSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
ARC Wessex Treatment Burden Group

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment burden is the effort required of patients to look after their health and the impact this has on their functioning and wellbeing. It is likely treatment burden changes over time as circumstances change for patients and health services. However, there are a lack of population-level studies of treatment burden change and factors associated with this change over time. Furthermore, there are currently no practical screening tools for treatment burden in time-pressured clinical settings or at population level. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a three-year follow-up of a cross-sectional survey of 723 people with multimorbidity (defined as three or more long-term conditions; LTCs) registered at GP practices in in Dorset, England. The survey will repeat collection of information on treatment burden (using the 10-item Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ) and a novel single-item screening tool), sociodemographics, medications, LTCs, health literacy and financial resource, as at baseline. Descriptive statistics will be used to compare change in treatment burden since the baseline survey in 2019 and associations of treatment burden change will be assessed using regression methods. Diagnostic test accuracy metrics will be used to evaluate the single-item treatment burden screening tool using the MTBQ as the gold-standard. Routine primary care data (including demographics, medications, LTCs, and healthcare usage data) will be extracted from medical records for consenting participants. A forward-stepwise, likelihood-ratio logistic regression model building approach will be employed in order to assess the utility of routine data metrics in quantifying treatment burden in comparison to self-reported treatment burden using the MTBQ. IMPACT: To the authors' knowledge, this will be the first study investigating longitudinal aspects of treatment burden. Findings will improve understanding of the extent to which treatment burden changes over time for people with multimorbidity and factors contributing to this change, as well as allowing better identification of people at risk of high treatment burden.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityPrimary Health CareCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ManagementEnglandFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsSelf CareSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID34843541
PMCPMC8629211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.