Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843490›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Modeling the influence of motor skills on literacy in third grade: Contributions of executive functions and handwriting.

Margaux Lê, Pauline Quémart, Anna Potocki, Manuel Gimenes, David Chesnet, Eric Lambert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Timed and untimed writing and math: shared and differential cognitive predictors in primary school.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Interpol questioned documents review 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margaux LêUniversité de Poitiers and, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Poitiers, France.
Pauline QuémartUniversité de Poitiers and, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Poitiers, France.
Anna PotockiUniversité de Poitiers and, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Poitiers, France.
Manuel GimenesUniversité de Poitiers and, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Poitiers, France.
David ChesnetFrench National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), MSHS de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Eric LambertUniversité de Poitiers and, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Poitiers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several nonlanguage factors influence literacy development, and motor skills are among those most studied. Despite the publication of several studies that have supported the existence of this relationship, the type of influence and underlying mechanisms have been little explored. Herein, we propose modeling the relationship between motor skills and literacy through structural equation modeling, testing the contribution of executive functions and handwriting skills as the possible mediators of this relationship. In a study of 278 third-grade children, we used a wide range of measures related to written language (reading, spelling, reading comprehension, and written production), fine motor skills (dominant hand, nondominant hand, and bimanual dexterity), executive functions (verbal and visuospatial working memory, inhibition, and shifting), and handwriting. Structural equation modeling of the relationship between these different variables indicated that in the third grade, the influence of fine motor skills on literacy is fully mediated by both executive functions and handwriting skills. These motor skills effects are observed for both low levels of processing (reading, spelling) and high levels of processing (reading comprehension, written production). The results are discussed in terms of the potential mechanisms underlying different literacy skills and their implications for pedagogical programs.

Indexed as

HandwritingLiteracyModels, BiologicalChildExecutive FunctionFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMotor Skills

Identifiers

PMID34843490
PMCPMC8629244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.