Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843488›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Prediction of the importance of auxiliary traits using computational intelligence and machine learning: A simulation study.

Antônio Carlos da Silva Júnior, Michele Jorge da Silva, Cosme Damião Cruz, Isabela de Castro Sant'Anna, Gabi Nunes Silva, Moysés Nascimento, Camila Ferreira Azevedo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antônio Carlos da Silva JúniorDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4200-6182
Michele Jorge da SilvaDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cosme Damião CruzDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Isabela de Castro Sant'AnnaCentro de Seringueira e Sistemas Agroflorestais, Instituto Agronômico (IAC), São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabi Nunes SilvaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics Scholar, R. Rio Amazonas, Ji-Paraná, RO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4161-9267
Moysés NascimentoDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Camila Ferreira AzevedoDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0438-5123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study evaluated the importance of auxiliary traits of a principal trait based on phenotypic information and previously known genetic structure using computational intelligence and machine learning to develop predictive tools for plant breeding. Data of an F2 population represented by 500 individuals, obtained from a cross between contrasting homozygous parents, were simulated. Phenotypic traits were simulated based on previously established means and heritability estimates (30%, 50%, and 80%); traits were distributed in a genome with 10 linkage groups, considering two alleles per marker. Four different scenarios were considered. For the principal trait, heritability was 50%, and 40 control loci were distributed in five linkage groups. Another phenotypic control trait with the same complexity as the principal trait but without any genetic relationship with it and without pleiotropy or a factorial link between the control loci for both traits was simulated. These traits shared a large number of control loci with the principal trait, but could be distinguished by the differential action of the environment on them, as reflected in heritability estimates (30%, 50%, and 80%). The coefficient of determination were considered to evaluate the proposed methodologies. Multiple regression, computational intelligence, and machine learning were used to predict the importance of the tested traits. Computational intelligence and machine learning were superior in extracting nonlinear information from model inputs and quantifying the relative contributions of phenotypic traits. The R2 values ranged from 44.0% - 83.0% and 79.0% - 94.0%, for computational intelligence and machine learning, respectively. In conclusion, the relative contributions of auxiliary traits in different scenarios in plant breeding programs can be efficiently predicted using computational intelligence and machine learning.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMachine LearningPlant BreedingArtificial IntelligenceGenetic LinkageGenotypePhenotypeQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID34843488
PMCPMC8629227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.