Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843480›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Evaluation of facial cleanliness and environmental improvement activities: Lessons learned from Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda.

Angelia M Sanders, Ruth Dixon, Logan Stuck, Michaela Kelly, Geordie Woods, Edridah M Muheki, Gilbert Baayenda, Michael Masika, Holystone Kafanikhale, Upendo Mwingira and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Angelia M SandersThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7284-0303
Ruth DixonSightsavers, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5946-0456
Logan StuckAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6825-3472
Michaela KellySightsavers, London, United Kingdom.
Geordie WoodsSightsavers, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6811-4678
Edridah M MuhekiUganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-0624-2890
Gilbert BaayendaUganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Michael MasikaMalawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Holystone KafanikhaleMalawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Upendo MwingiraTanzania Ministry of Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-6852-6402
Leah WohlgemuthSightsavers, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7000-9049
Sightsavers · GBMinistry of Health · UGMinistry of Health · MWAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLCarter Center · USMinistry of Health and Social Welfare · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization promotes the SAFE (Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness, and Environmental improvements) strategy for trachoma control and prevention. The F&E components of the strategy focus on promotion of healthy hygiene and sanitation behaviors. In order to monitor F&E activities implemented across villages and schools in Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda, an F&E Monitoring and Evaluation (FEME) framework was developed to track quarterly program outputs and to provide the basis for a pre and post evaluation of the activities. Results showed an increase in knowledge at the school and household levels, and in some cases, an increase in presence of hand/face washing stations. However, this did not always result in a change in trachoma prevention behaviors such as facial cleanliness or keeping compounds free of human feces. The results highlight that the F&E programs were effective in increasing awareness of trachoma prevention but not able to translate that knowledge into changes in behavior during the time between pre and post-surveys. This study also indicates the potential to improve the data collection and survey design and notes that the period of intervention was not long enough to measure significant changes.

Indexed as

HygieneChlamydia trachomatisEnvironmental MonitoringFaceHand DisinfectionHealth PromotionHumansMalawiProgram EvaluationSchoolsTanzaniaTrachomaUganda

Identifiers

PMID34843480
PMCPMC8659352
OpenAlexW3216104054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.